When Dave talked to me a week ago, he specifically said that he did NOT want to chair the convention, but neither did he think Tom was capable. He saw himself in a strong second position, handling hotel negotiations, which is the area where he feels most competent. I think the problem is that we are still talking to two individuals here, as opposed to spokesmen for a cohesive group. As I see it, they still need to come up with a leader, and then we can negotiate through that person. THAT person will have the responsibility for using both Dave and Tom effectively, and keeping them reined in as needed.
Do they have a person capable of doing that job? Your guess is as good as mine. And while Dave is reluctant to take the captain's chair himself, he is also pretty critical of the other crew members. But that's typical Dave. No one can do anything as well as he could (if he wanted to) until they prove otherwise.<g> He did, however, admit that we had done a great job with TAG, and that he doubted that any of the old PAM subscribers had "minded" getting TAG instead. (strong praise, coming from Dave ;-)
Karen----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
To: "AGA Advisory Committee" <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] Fwd: Re: The so-called "Bid Doc"
I agree completely. Although, perhaps, Erik's is a more tempered view than mine. I don't think we should take what we can get because that's the best we can get. If there isn't promise of an outstanding, well produced event, we should concentrate on 2006. We can help in the discussions that might lead to such promise, but it's not something we should confer. There is already a lot that AGA staff are promising in the Reqs & Guidelines doc. I think the rest of the promise and commitment needs to come from the local. I'm a bit uncomfrtable because, so far, it seems like Tom is the one trying to rally folks into action. Dave is not; he is doing something else. It looks like he won't move until he sees the bandwagon, and then he'll climb in front provided that . . . . -- but I could be all wrong about that. Until I understand what that heck he's doing, what he's talking about, I'm not inclined to think of him as the potential leader of an effort he has not been leading. Pardon my early morning coarseness, but, as for AGA atonement for perceived trangessions, my only thought is, "Pphlbbbbbbbbbbbbbttttt!" sh --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:. . . I would like to find out exactly what he means, because he often doesn't mean what we think he is saying in e-mail. But, especially after last convention, there's NO way we're going to approve anything or anyone without a thorough review. It's not up to the AGA to pre-appoint anyone or give anyone any kind of guarantees. We can make suggestions, we can talk about what is likely to work, but that's all. - Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm_______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
_______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm