I agree completely. Although, perhaps, Erik's is a more
tempered view than mine.
I don't think we should take what we can get because that's
the best we can get. If there isn't promise of an
outstanding, well produced event, we should concentrate on
2006. We can help in the discussions that might lead to
such promise, but it's not something we should confer.
There is already a lot that AGA staff are promising in the
Reqs & Guidelines doc. I think the rest of the promise and
commitment needs to come from the local.
I'm a bit uncomfrtable because, so far, it seems like Tom
is the one trying to rally folks into action. Dave is not;
he is doing something else. It looks like he won't move
until he sees the bandwagon, and then he'll climb in front
provided that . . . . -- but I could be all wrong about
that.
Until I understand what that heck he's doing, what he's
talking about, I'm not inclined to think of him as the
potential leader of an effort he has not been leading.
Pardon my early morning coarseness, but, as for AGA
atonement for perceived trangessions, my only thought is,
"Pphlbbbbbbbbbbbbbttttt!"
sh
--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
. . . I would like to find
out exactly what
he means, because he often doesn't mean what we think he
is saying in
e-mail. But, especially after last convention, there's
NO way we're going
to approve anything or anyone without a thorough review.
It's not up
to the AGA to pre-appoint anyone or give anyone any kind
of guarantees.
We can make suggestions, we can talk about what is likely
to work, but
that's all.
- Erik
--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm