I think we should direct him to seek permission from the author, who has the copyrights to the material. I think we are limited in this under copyright law while the author is not -- in fact, the author may grant use or even relinquish her or his copyright if they choose, but we cannot do that for them. sh --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@rightstuffwebsites.com> wrote: > Well, re-reading my own e-mail I think that Amano's > articles qualify as > non-originals and therefore cannot be reprinted. Sorry. > > But I don't believe that we should bite this hand. That > could be > dangerous. I think we should be nice to Marcus and say > that the rules > were intended for paper re-prints and no permissions are > given for web > re-prints. However, we are as interested in growing the > hobby as he is, > and was there a specific article that he had in mind? > Then I can help > him with one or two that we have control over (with > appropriate links, > of course). How about that? > > And then make sure to re-word the rules on the web site > and in the next TAG. > > Cheryl > > > > Cheryl Rogers wrote: > > I think an original article is one that we have not > ourselves reprinted > > in TAG from somewhere else. > > > > I do not think our rules address electronic reprinting, > and it should. > > > > We are leaving ourselves wide open to have, say, > Takashi Amano's > > articles reprinted on the web. > > > > Cheryl > > > > S. Hieber wrote: > > > >> This prompted me to go back and read the rules to > which he > >> might be referring: > >> > >> "Original articles appear in The Aquatic Gardener > (TAG) may > >> be reprinted by non-commercial organizations (unless > >> specifically stated otherwise) provided that the > proper > >> credit is given to the author and to The Aquatic > Gardener, > >> and that at least one copy of the publication > containing > >> the reprinted material is sent to TAG's editor at the > time > >> of publication. Credit to TAG as the original source > must > >> appear at the end of the article, as follows, " > >> > >> > >> > >> Is that first sentence missing a word? > >> > >> Can a reader assume that any article that is not an > >> original article is so noted when published in TAG? > >> > >> > >> sh > >> --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> -------- Original Message -------- > >>> Subject: RE: Your AGA Membership > >>> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:04:20 -0700 > >>> From: <creditcards@aquatic-store.com> > >>> To: <membership@aquatic-gardeners.org> > >>> > >>> Cheryl I have a non related question. I own the not > for > >>> profit website > >>> http://www.fish-forums.com as well as some for profit > >>> sites such as > >>> aquatic-store.com > >>> > >>>> From reading the rules I can republish the articles > on > >>> > >>> my forum without any > >>> other permission needed due to it being not for > profit?? > >>> Please let me know > >>> Thanks > >>> Marcus > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Cheryl Rogers [mailto:cheryl@wilstream.com] > >>> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 7:22 AM > >>> To: sales@aquatic-store.com > >>> Subject: Your AGA Membership > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear Marcus: > >>> > >>> Due to a mailing error, the note on the envelope of > TAG > >>> 18-2 was > >>> misprinted. It should have read, "expires in 6 > issues." > >>> We regret the > >>> error and are taking steps to ensure that it does not > >>> happen again. > >>> > >>> If you have any questions, please feel free to e-mail > me > >>> at > >>> membership@aquatic-gardeners.org. > >>> > >>> Cheryl Rogers > >>> Membership Chair > >>> Aquatic Gardeners Association > >>> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm