Frederick misses my point (being that speakers freak out when having to sign things, and also that they're very protective of what they see as their own work).
But his little tangent on copyright of images is something any speaker should always look at carefully. Pretty sure nearly everything on our AGA disks are original or with permission (except for Shaun Winterton's talk which stole a lot of pictures off other people... I know because many are from the aquascaping contest site! also my talk on the state of the AGA in 2003 appropriated some low-res celebrity photos off Google).
- Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:52:44 -0400 From: "Hamilton, Frederick (hamiltfn)" <HAMILTFN@ucmail.uc.edu> Reply-To: ACA Board and Cadre <aca-cadre@thekrib.com> To: ACA Board and Cadre <aca-cadre@thekrib.com> Subject: RE: [Aca-cadre] convention dvd bit the dust Hi, All: The proposed form gave us permission to use the talk, and contained assurances that the material was not infringing anyone else's rights. These are pretty basic and bare-bones types of items. As I watched the presentations, it was apparent to me that many of the talks used "borrowed" material (maps, fish images, and even popular music), so I am not surprised that the authors grew concerned about the form. Under the "fair use" doctrine in copyright, limited educational uses of material are generally permitted (when the quantity of the material used is small, the purpose of the use is for bona fide educational purposes, etc.) When admission is charged to view the material, the waters become a little more murky. When this material is repackaged and resold, the waters become murkier still; I am not at all sure that we would have a sufficient defense to a lawsuit if, for example, an ACA-produced convention DVD containing "misappropriated" third-party images or text turned fell into the hands of the owner of the material. Certainly, I would be hard pressed to defend our unlicensed use of Pink Floyd's "Money" on a "fair use" rationale. Ultimately, it's a risk-benefit analysis. The risk that National Geographic, for example, would sue the ACA (or a speaker) for unauthorized use of digitized maps of Africa during a talk at an ACA convention is probably fairly remote. As a technical matter, though, both the speaker and the ACA and TCA could have been sued by National Geographic following that talk. When a talk which uses someone else's work without their permission is repackaged for sale, the risk increases significantly. In my opinion, we have the right to expect that our speakers will only use materials which they have created, or for which they have gotten appropriate permission. However, in fairness to them, I agree that we should raise this issue early in the process, and not at the eleventh hour. I'm certainly available to work on a "nicer" form. Perhaps the most non-threatening form would seek permission to retain a copy of the talk(s) for archival or "internal" purposes, and leave it at that. We can also work out a profit-sharing arrangement in advance, but in such a case, I would even more strongly urge that the presenter(s) give us assurances about the non-infringing character of their talks. Fred Hamilton, J.D. Associate General Counsel University of Cincinnati Medical Center Phone: (513) 558-7748 FAX: (513) 558-0549 The foregoing message may contain attorney-client information. You should not copy, forward or otherwise distribute this email without the permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message without retaining a copy and inform the sender of your action. Your cooperation will be appreciated. _____ From: aca-cadre-bounces@thekrib.com [mailto:aca-cadre-bounces@thekrib.com] On Behalf Of hawkimw@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:12 PM To: ACA Board and Cadre Subject: Re: [Aca-cadre] convention dvd bit the dust Thanks for your help on this-interesting -------------- Original message --------------
Hi folks, After reading the meeting minutes, I just wanted to follow up on the issue
of selling convention DVD's. On Thursday night, I asked the speakers about having their talk on a DVD, and they were mostly OK with it. But when I got to asking them to sign the waiver, their demenour immediately changed to one of suspicion (the extreme of which was that Spencer Jack made sure to physically delete his and Jeff Cardwell's powerpoint shows off Larry Lampert's computer as soon as he had finished presenting). As my primary goal has always been to get a good quality ARCHIVE of the talks, I immediately dropped all plans and legal documents, and went back to my traditional spiel of asking if I could tape talks FO! R ME and for
the
local club's internal library only, and I got no further problems (except from Spencer who I think now views me as a very suspicious person). Ironically, one of the folks who didn't want his talk made available (Willem) asked if he could get a copy of Hernan's talk from Friday night. Go figure. What does this mean in practical terms? First that Ron C was dead-on in his analysis of speakers' protectiveness of their work. I doubt such a plan will ever work unless (a) one works out a way for the speakers to "get something out of it", (b) permission is granted waaaay in advance, perhaps as part of the speaking arrangement, or (c) a significantly "nicer" form is drafted. In any case, it's waaay to much work for me; I'll stick to taping selected talks for my own archive (my primary goal anyway) & making sure the live house sou! nd is the best possible for the attendees. - Erik PS: Looking for Hernan's e-mail address so I can ask him for his powerpoint slides. -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ Aca-cadre mailing list Aca-cadre@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aca-cadre
_______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm