In a message dated 3/28/04 10:18:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, roger@spinn.net writes: Lilaeopsis doesn't seem to be as popular as it was a few years ago. Any idea why? I've been wondering the same thing myself because I remember when people would pay top dollar and perhaps even kill to have a carpet of Lilaeopsis. Maybe the newness wore off since it's been around and available longer than Glosso, Elatine, Marsilea, or the truly dwarf forms of Hairgrass. I still think it looks fabulous myself, but I've had it get choked with gunk and algae just like all the rest. I haven't grown dwarf hair grass yet; I have E. montevidenses and have in the distant past grown E. vivipara. Maybe if the Lilaeopsis doesn't work out I'll try hair grass. Hairgrass can get choked too, but it's not as noticeable when it does -- the base just looks darker. The individual blades are so thin that not much can really grow on them. Bob Olesen --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, please send mail to majordomo@thekrib.com with "Unsubscribe aga-member" in the body of the message. Archives of this list can be found at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-member/