[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
[AGA-Member] Re: AGA-Member Digest, Vol 2, Issue 4
No TAG in Charlotte, N.C. either.
Sorry you've had so much trouble.
Richard Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: <aga-member-request@thekrib.com>
To: <aga-member@thekrib.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: AGA-Member Digest, Vol 2, Issue 4
> Send AGA-Member mailing list submissions to
> aga-member@thekrib.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> aga-member-request@thekrib.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> aga-member-owner@thekrib.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of AGA-Member digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. No TAG 17-2 (Jeff Kostiuk)
> 2. Re:AGA Membership Drive (Robert H)
> 3. Re: Re:AGA Membership Drive (Cheryl Rogers)
> 4. Re: No TAG 17-2 (Cheryl Rogers)
> 5. RE: No TAG 17-2 (Shawn Van Doren)
> 6. RE: No TAG 17-2 (Erik Olson)
> 7. RE: No TAG 17-2 (Shawn Van Doren)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:00:33 -0400
> From: "Jeff Kostiuk" <jlln1991@msn.com>
> Subject: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> To: <AGA-Member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <BAY3-DAV28jFbUcOV1E0000753e@hotmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Cheryl,
>
> Sorry to bother you but I also haven't received TAG 17-2 (April - June).
> Thanks for all your help,
>
> Jeff Kostiuk, New Jersey
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:05:27 -0700
> From: "Robert H" <robertph3@comcast.net>
> Subject: [AGA-Member] Re:AGA Membership Drive
> To: <aga-member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <002701c47a88$4bd61a00$0c34a443@robert>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> >>Robert Hudson of Aquabotanic.com has referred six more people to the AGA
> in
> the last week or so! Thanks, Robert!<<
>
> What's my total now? And thanks for the tee shirt!
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:10:40 -0500
> From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
> Subject: Re: [AGA-Member] Re:AGA Membership Drive
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat <aga-member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <41119720.1000200@wilstream.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> You're up to 19. Go Robert Go!
>
> Cheryl
>
>
> Robert H wrote:
>
> >>>Robert Hudson of Aquabotanic.com has referred six more people to the
AGA
> >
> > in
> > the last week or so! Thanks, Robert!<<
> >
> > What's my total now? And thanks for the tee shirt!
> >
> > Robert
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> Aquatic Gardeners Association
> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:19:37 -0500
> From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
> Subject: Re: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat <aga-member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <41119939.30605@wilstream.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Folks,
>
> I have been working hard to make sure that this mistake never happens
> again. A long time ago the AGA Board decided to send TAG first class
> because of just this sort of thing--TAGs go astray, take too long, and we
> end up spending more money replacing them than it would have taken to send
> it first class in the first place.
>
> Unfortunately, despite repeated requests/demands/reminders, the (now)
> previous mailers sent TAG 17-2 Bulk Standard. (They may also have done
this
> with TAG 17-1, but I can't prove it, unless someone finds their envelope.)
> Bulk Standard means that the post office will deliver it when they get
darn
> well good and ready, which is not good enough.
>
> Hopefully, the new mailer will listen when I say that I want TAG to go
> First Class! I am going to stay on top of this. Karen and I have worked
way
> too hard getting TAG out in a timely way to let the mailer mess it up.
>
> If ANYONE else still does not have TAG 17-2, let me know and I will
replace
> it immediately.
>
> Meanwhile, we can use this list to talk about aquatic plant stuff!
>
> Cheryl
>
> Jeff Kostiuk wrote:
>
> > Cheryl,
> >
> > Sorry to bother you but I also haven't received TAG 17-2 (April - June).
> > Thanks for all your help,
> >
> > Jeff Kostiuk, New Jersey
>
> --
> Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> Aquatic Gardeners Association
> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:46:20 -0700
> From: "Shawn Van Doren" <shawnuf@comcast.net>
> Subject: RE: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat"
> <aga-member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <GFEGLECIKKOMFDPKHOMIGEDKCLAA.shawnuf@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hello Cheryl,
> I have not had a problem receiving my TAG issues. My husband and I put
out
> the monthly newsletter for Greater Portland Aquarium Society and we do all
> the work ourselves. While I wouldn't recommend it for most, I have had
> great success with more prompt delivery using Pitney Bowes Click Stamp
> software which integrates with Microsoft Outlook and Accesss (we keep our
> membership database in Acess). We send them out First Class, the software
> prints the indicia and the delivery is shorter than with just postage. I
> know the mailhouses are more efficient but for us this works. Just my 2
> cents.
>
> Shawn Van Doren
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com
> [mailto:aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com]On Behalf Of Cheryl Rogers
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:20 PM
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat
> Subject: Re: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I have been working hard to make sure that this mistake never happens
> again. A long time ago the AGA Board decided to send TAG first class
> because of just this sort of thing--TAGs go astray, take too long, and we
> end up spending more money replacing them than it would have taken to send
> it first class in the first place.
>
> Unfortunately, despite repeated requests/demands/reminders, the (now)
> previous mailers sent TAG 17-2 Bulk Standard. (They may also have done
this
> with TAG 17-1, but I can't prove it, unless someone finds their envelope.)
> Bulk Standard means that the post office will deliver it when they get
darn
> well good and ready, which is not good enough.
>
> Hopefully, the new mailer will listen when I say that I want TAG to go
> First Class! I am going to stay on top of this. Karen and I have worked
way
> too hard getting TAG out in a timely way to let the mailer mess it up.
>
> If ANYONE else still does not have TAG 17-2, let me know and I will
replace
> it immediately.
>
> Meanwhile, we can use this list to talk about aquatic plant stuff!
>
> Cheryl
>
> Jeff Kostiuk wrote:
>
> > Cheryl,
> >
> > Sorry to bother you but I also haven't received TAG 17-2 (April - June).
> > Thanks for all your help,
> >
> > Jeff Kostiuk, New Jersey
>
> --
> Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> Aquatic Gardeners Association
> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-Member mailing list
> AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 22:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>
> Subject: RE: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat <aga-member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408042251210.5843@pulcher.thekrib.com>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> I did this sort of thing too with the GSAS (who, btw, were the source of
> our fab models for the aquascaping contest PR this year) back when I was
> at the helm. I think I used stamps.com. It was tolerable for 100 copies.
> When I did postcards, I even printed the "stamp" directly on the cards.
>
> At 1000 copies, sticking them all in envelopes and putting stamps or
> internet postage labels on em....yechh. Not unless I had kids who don't
> mind working for cheap stuffing and stamping like Gomberg's grandchildren
> did for PAM. Of course, makes me think that's probably what goes on at
> these mailers.
>
> - Erik
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Shawn Van Doren wrote:
>
> > Hello Cheryl,
> > I have not had a problem receiving my TAG issues. My husband and I put
out
> > the monthly newsletter for Greater Portland Aquarium Society and we do
all
> > the work ourselves. While I wouldn't recommend it for most, I have had
> > great success with more prompt delivery using Pitney Bowes Click Stamp
> > software which integrates with Microsoft Outlook and Accesss (we keep
our
> > membership database in Acess). We send them out First Class, the
software
> > prints the indicia and the delivery is shorter than with just postage.
I
> > know the mailhouses are more efficient but for us this works. Just my 2
> > cents.
> >
> > Shawn Van Doren
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com
> > [mailto:aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com]On Behalf Of Cheryl Rogers
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:20 PM
> > To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat
> > Subject: Re: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I have been working hard to make sure that this mistake never happens
> > again. A long time ago the AGA Board decided to send TAG first class
> > because of just this sort of thing--TAGs go astray, take too long, and
we
> > end up spending more money replacing them than it would have taken to
send
> > it first class in the first place.
> >
> > Unfortunately, despite repeated requests/demands/reminders, the (now)
> > previous mailers sent TAG 17-2 Bulk Standard. (They may also have done
this
> > with TAG 17-1, but I can't prove it, unless someone finds their
envelope.)
> > Bulk Standard means that the post office will deliver it when they get
darn
> > well good and ready, which is not good enough.
> >
> > Hopefully, the new mailer will listen when I say that I want TAG to go
> > First Class! I am going to stay on top of this. Karen and I have worked
way
> > too hard getting TAG out in a timely way to let the mailer mess it up.
> >
> > If ANYONE else still does not have TAG 17-2, let me know and I will
replace
> > it immediately.
> >
> > Meanwhile, we can use this list to talk about aquatic plant stuff!
> >
> > Cheryl
> >
> > Jeff Kostiuk wrote:
> >
> >> Cheryl,
> >>
> >> Sorry to bother you but I also haven't received TAG 17-2 (April -
June).
> >> Thanks for all your help,
> >>
> >> Jeff Kostiuk, New Jersey
> >
> > --
> > Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> > Aquatic Gardeners Association
> > http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-Member mailing list
> > AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-Member mailing list
> > AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
> >
>
> --
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 05:44:03 -0700
> From: "Shawn Van Doren" <shawnuf@comcast.net>
> Subject: RE: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat"
> <aga-member@thekrib.com>
> Message-ID: <GFEGLECIKKOMFDPKHOMIGEDNCLAA.shawnuf@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Right-o Erik! It is alot of work.
>
> Shawn
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com
> [mailto:aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com]On Behalf Of Erik Olson
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:58 PM
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat
> Subject: RE: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
>
>
> I did this sort of thing too with the GSAS (who, btw, were the source of
> our fab models for the aquascaping contest PR this year) back when I was
> at the helm. I think I used stamps.com. It was tolerable for 100 copies.
> When I did postcards, I even printed the "stamp" directly on the cards.
>
> At 1000 copies, sticking them all in envelopes and putting stamps or
> internet postage labels on em....yechh. Not unless I had kids who don't
> mind working for cheap stuffing and stamping like Gomberg's grandchildren
> did for PAM. Of course, makes me think that's probably what goes on at
> these mailers.
>
> - Erik
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Shawn Van Doren wrote:
>
> > Hello Cheryl,
> > I have not had a problem receiving my TAG issues. My husband and I put
> out
> > the monthly newsletter for Greater Portland Aquarium Society and we do
all
> > the work ourselves. While I wouldn't recommend it for most, I have had
> > great success with more prompt delivery using Pitney Bowes Click Stamp
> > software which integrates with Microsoft Outlook and Accesss (we keep
our
> > membership database in Acess). We send them out First Class, the
software
> > prints the indicia and the delivery is shorter than with just postage.
I
> > know the mailhouses are more efficient but for us this works. Just my 2
> > cents.
> >
> > Shawn Van Doren
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com
> > [mailto:aga-member-bounces@thekrib.com]On Behalf Of Cheryl Rogers
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:20 PM
> > To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Member Chat
> > Subject: Re: [AGA-Member] No TAG 17-2
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I have been working hard to make sure that this mistake never happens
> > again. A long time ago the AGA Board decided to send TAG first class
> > because of just this sort of thing--TAGs go astray, take too long, and
we
> > end up spending more money replacing them than it would have taken to
send
> > it first class in the first place.
> >
> > Unfortunately, despite repeated requests/demands/reminders, the (now)
> > previous mailers sent TAG 17-2 Bulk Standard. (They may also have done
> this
> > with TAG 17-1, but I can't prove it, unless someone finds their
envelope.)
> > Bulk Standard means that the post office will deliver it when they get
> darn
> > well good and ready, which is not good enough.
> >
> > Hopefully, the new mailer will listen when I say that I want TAG to go
> > First Class! I am going to stay on top of this. Karen and I have worked
> way
> > too hard getting TAG out in a timely way to let the mailer mess it up.
> >
> > If ANYONE else still does not have TAG 17-2, let me know and I will
> replace
> > it immediately.
> >
> > Meanwhile, we can use this list to talk about aquatic plant stuff!
> >
> > Cheryl
> >
> > Jeff Kostiuk wrote:
> >
> >> Cheryl,
> >>
> >> Sorry to bother you but I also haven't received TAG 17-2 (April -
June).
> >> Thanks for all your help,
> >>
> >> Jeff Kostiuk, New Jersey
> >
> > --
> > Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> > Aquatic Gardeners Association
> > http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-Member mailing list
> > AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-Member mailing list
> > AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
> >
>
> --
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-Member mailing list
> AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-Member mailing list
> AGA-Member@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member
>
>
> End of AGA-Member Digest, Vol 2, Issue 4
> ****************************************
_______________________________________________
AGA-Member mailing list
AGA-Member@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-member