|
I didn't even notice the last name... pretty
funny!<g>
Karen
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 4:49
PM
Subject: Re: PAM
2 great responses, Karen. I would be amazed if
we didn't get some more.
Lou and Luanne Blossom -- too much. -- gotta
get them to help us with project plants.
See ya.
David
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 3:05
PM
Subject: Re: PAM
Just to make sure you understand, I believe
that the deal with Dave was that we would extend people's memberships by the
same number of issues as they were owed of PAM... this is not a $ for $
exchange but a magazine for magazine exchange. The AGA bought the back
issues of PAM from Dave, and to help out with the problem of Dave's
subscribers, we arranged this deal. (in the hopes that the people
who were NOT AGA members already would choose to stay when their
subscriptions expired) My understanding was that Dave had contacted his
subscribers explaining this. Again, if you have a problem with it,
please contact Dave directly.
Karen
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:11
PM
Subject: Re: PAM
Works for me. I sent Dave 65
bucks. That translates to about 4 years of AGA dues. FYI, I'm
Lou, my wife is Luanne. Lou
Hi Luanne, yes, PAM is gone. The
AGA has agreed to take on the PAM subscribers as AGA members. In
your case, it would be an extention of your membership. (there was less
overlap than you might think) In your particular case, since
you're already an AGA member, if that doesn't work for you, I'd talk to
Dave G. directly. I've cc'd him with this message so the two of
you can get in touch with each other.
Karen
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002
9:59 AM
Subject: PAM
Hi Karen. Exactly what do you mean by
"Unfortunately now that we have lost PAM". I hope that doesn't
mean PAM has gone belly up. I just recently suscribed to it for
three years. I also suscribe to AGA. Lou Blossom
|