Re: TAG

[Neil Frank <nfrank@mindspring.com>]

At 10:44 PM 5/14/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>> The reason I asked is that when I was doing TAG, the printer (or its
>> subsidiary mailer) had its own indicia. That eliminated the need to
>> continue our own bulk printing permit.
>
>We could certainly go back to bulk.  


NO, NO, I was not suggesting that we go back to bulk!! I just figured that
the printer/mailer might have other options. I would rather see AGA pay
full 1st class. 


>If the decision is up to me, I'd can the idea of periodical rate unless we
>found someone who wanted to do all the recordkeeping required.  Then we need
>to either stay with first class, or, if we decide that it's too expensive,
>go back to bulk.

My recommendation is that you discuss record keeping options with Jack and
David (and try to keep it as simple as you think the USPS rules allow), see
if say Jack who does the labels can come up with a simple and sufficient
record keeping methodology; and then make a decision that fits everyone's
time constrainsts. If something can be worked out to get periodical rate,
fine. Otherwise, go with 1st class..... but I am just one vote on the SC.

Neil

PS. I dont know what PAM used. If periodical, I assume you already checked
with Gomberg.


  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".