[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Treasurer's Report 1st 6 months 2004 (more or less)	--v1.2
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Treasurer's Report 1st 6 months 2004 (more or less)	--v1.2
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Let me add this clarification of what's grouped in the
report:
I took any membership transactions and allocated them to
Memberships. I could have split up the combos based on some
percentage of revenues, but it would have been a lot of
work and it didn't seem worthwhile when I wasn't yet
decided on what should or should not be profit/cost
centers. 
I took any mailing charges related to TAGs (and presumably
memberships since I didn't have any consistent way to
distinguish the two) and allocated them to TAGs. I.e., I
did not treat Memberships as a cost center.
sh
--- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote:
> How are we differentiating "TAG" expenses
=====
Want to get dirty but stay clean? 
Diana Walstad, author of _Ecology of the Planted Aquarium_ will discuss soil 
supplemented aquarium substrates at the 2004 AGA Convention.
Convention Details/Registration at aquatic-gardeners.org & gwapa.org
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc