Re: [AGA-sc] [Fwd: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation]

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

--- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:

> 
> > Just my observations.  If we had the "regional club
> reps" -- free or
> > otherwise -- involved in the MC, and shifted our main
> discussions there,
> > this might improve participation and decision-making
> without having to
> > expand the board too much.
> 
> I REALLY like that idea.  The only thing we'll have to be
> careful of is make
> sure that group knows they are there in an advisory
> capacity, and that all
> final decisions are made by the BOD.  If that group is
> ONLY open to
> representatives of member clubs plus our handful of
> non-BOD worker-bees, it
> should be a nice perk for those clubs.  And it will also
> give a us a place
> where we can watch for the cream to rise to the top.<g>



On way to do that is to call the group the AGA Advisory
Committee of AGA Advisory Group, etc.  

I haven't found the AGA lacking for ideas so much as labor
to develop and execute them. Calls for volunteers bring us
suggestions but not much in the way of effort. If the
participation is just ideas, then I can see that helping
AGA's image as a participatory organization. Reason enough
to do it, imo. And it might enhance word-of-mouth. But it
might not bring much else in terms of changes or projects.

Otoh, the more people in the tent, the more likely that
something's gonna happen. ;-)

sh
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc