[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] [Fwd: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation]
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [Fwd: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation]
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
You caught me. I was confusing bulk memberships at $16 each
with prems at whataever meverships are involved with that.
I stand corrected although still confused. :-\
sh
--- Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, S. Hieber wrote:
>
> > I don't disagree with any of your points generally. But
> I
> > have a couple of concerns. Frist, if we have some idea
> that
> > we will have more than just SFBAAPS, that we will get
> many
> > or at least several premies, then that is a diff
> situatiion
> > than if we only get one or two. It should be enough to
> page
> > for a sheet (4 pages). I say this only because we don't
> > know how much peripheral impact there will be. By
> > peripheral impact I mean, adding lots of membership and
> > involvement bringing in even more members by word of
> mouth.
>
>
> Scott,
>
> I look at the whole premier membership thing...and
> calculate that they are
> getting 10 memberships for $100, where normally the
> individuals would pay
> $200 for that. So that is $100 off. This is money that
> normal goes
> towards production of TAG. So potentially we are losing
> $100 in revenue
> that would go to TAG production/AGA business.
>
> In addition to this, they would be taking up page space
> that could be used
> for advertisers, or cool articles (that keep people
> signed up), then they
> are also getting back issues, worth some unknown value,
> and then they are
> also getting a convention DVD, which has some
> production/material cost as
> well.
>
> Soooooo, I don't think the money from premier memberships
> would pay for
> extra pages, in a way the AGA will be loosing existing
> money that is used
> in the the production of TAG.
>
> Now I think the thought is hopefully we are getting
> people we wouldn't
> reach otherwise, and perhaps get new members.
>
> But seeing this, I am not so sure.
>
> I am Okay going along with it, but I really don't thing
> Premier
> memberships will bring in extra revenue for new pages in
> TAG, and I hope
> they don't create too much of a loss from the existing
> money coming into
> support tag.
>
> Kathy
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc