Incidentally, my software (kathyanderik.com-code) also produced photos of 640 pixels wide last year, so I'm not sure why it seems so different.
But if there's a problem, you guys are going to have to tell him that. There's no way I can do this now. I'm plumb out of criticising this year. This is 3 for 3 in the last few weeks; I just can't do any more.
- Erik On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Karen Randall wrote:
I'd rather see him put the time into making the site that he's already got going more user-friendly (IE large enough to enjoy) before adding older pictures at a too-small size. Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 6:07 AM Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Re: [AGA-mcm] Web SiteHe told me they are at 600 and he can do 800 but "that's in the future" sh --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:Jay can definitely upload bigger pictures. I think it's his choice of making them small. I've never kept the old pictures around for longer than a year. Didn't really think it was that important as they weren't a critical part of the AGA site, just sort of a "fun" temporal thing...and not really well sorted (of course I think they are worse-sorted this year... i.e., left as "by person" rather than mixed together for each category... that was actually the only difficult work I did last year, merging in all the timelines for 4 different photographers and trying to pick the best). - Erik On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, S. Hieber wrote:I need to here from Erik. If he still has the pages and they just aren't linked -- and all he has to do is turn them back on, then that's a good reason to do it thatway,to jsut turn them back on. Anyway, I want to ask Jay if there isn't a way to makethepics in the gallery bigger. sh --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:Oh, I wasn't suggesting changing what Jay did with the 2004 pix. I don't think that would be fair to him. But I hate that you can't see them at a large enough size to, well, SEE them. I just don't want him to get his hands on the oldstuffthat worked better, and make it worse. (and I THINK there were pix there from as long ago as the first Amano year... maybe further back) The problem is, finding a tactful way of saying, "Oh, don't bother putting all that work into making them worse."<g> I am fairly sure that the reason there is no link tothemat the moment has nothing to do with the fact that Jay hasn't set themupin his "gallery" style. Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:02 PM Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Re: [AGA-mcm] Web SiteWell, we could take another poll ;-) or we could put the old convention pics back up the waytheywere and then show counter with more hits on the oldpicsthan the 2004 pics. ;-) or we can just leave it for a while and eventuallychangeit(more work for Erik) or just leave 2004 as it is and put the old pics back(mypref). I don't think the gallery is awful, even though it'snot mystyle -- it's so, so *forumish*. We had more than just AGA2K3 before, didn't we? Idon'tknow if I'd put the old pics up as part of thisgallery. Ilike the old way better too, so I would not want tochangethe other photos, but I doubt it's worth the painsandhardfeelings to change the 2004 gallery. So that's my shadow vote. But I leave it to Erik's aesthetic sensibilities -- besides, it'd be work forhim,votin's easy. sh --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:Sorry to jump lists again, but... I think the oldversionwas WAY better than the new one. How do we deal with THAT?!?!<g> Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "jay luto" <jayluto@hotmail.com> To: <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 2:49 PM Subject: RE: [AGA-mcm] Web SiteErik, You can link me to "old" pictures and I will bemorethan happy to uploadthem to AGA Gallery as - AGA 2003 - event. Regards, Jay Luto www.greenstouch.comFrom: "Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> Reply-To: AGA Advisory Committee<aga-mcm@thekrib.com>To: "AGA Advisory Committee" <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> Subject: [AGA-mcm] Web Site Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:23:32 -0500 Hi Erik, Roger Miller just mentioned over on APC that thereisno longer a link onthe web site to the earlier convention photos. Isthis on purpose?Karen _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm_______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc-- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
-- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc