Re: [AGA-sc] Proposal Doc to Barr

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>]

I don't know if you'll consider this good news or bad news, but I am 
editing the doc. I have many questions and changes.

Last year I was so tired I couldn't even bring myself to thoroughly read 
it. But I know more about what is going on now and I have minor changes and 
major questions.

Do you think that modifying the word doc is the best way to get these 
changes to you?

I think we should wait.

Cheryl

S. Hieber wrote:
> Since Tom wants a proposal Requirements & guidelines  doc,
> I'dhate to send the old version if we can send a newer one.
>
> You folks think we'll have comments within a few days on
> the dreaded Word document?
>
> OR
>
> You do you think the draft looks good enough to send to Tom
> with the caveat that it's subject to some changes?
>
> OR would you rather wait. . .
>
> Btw, I don't know what Word is doing to mess up the
> formatting. I've cleaned as much of the formatting as I
> could get my hands on, but unlike Wrodperf, you can't get
> Word to actually reveal and give you access to all the
> formatting codes it buries in the text.
>
>
> I'm open to ideas to try to make the doc easier to use by
> others.
>
> sh
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc

--
Cheryl Rogers, Membership
Aquatic Gardeners Association
http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc