Re: [AGA-sc] One little thing

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, S. Hieber wrote:

> You too? Me too; why I only sent it in draft. It's the best
> I could pull together in any reasonable amount of time and
> with the available data. I thought it more important to get
> the report out than to delay and try to further parse
> transactions prior to June 2004. There is more work that
> could be done along that line, but it's a lot more work and
> I'm not sure that it will give a much diff overall picture.

Exactly, draft = send comments.  Just suggesting we should add a sentence 
or two noting that with the exception of Diana's books, done as one-shots, 
no new books were purchased in 2004 (maybe as part of the explanation 
about the unusual Passthrough Amano revenue and Kasselmann books that 
netted us $125 at the convention).

You have to report the numbers, so the report is fine!

We could still run a periodical analysis of the book effectiveness by 
examining how many of each book were sold each year, and subtracting the 
cost of the books from the net income on them.  But not today. :)

  - Erik

--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc