Re: [AGA-sc] SFBAAPS bid -- half an hour a day

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

I like it. (So long as it's on index cards ;-)

sh

--- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote:

> yes, you are right yet again oh wise one.
> 
> Hey what about  this for a crazy and a little unstable
> idea...
> 
> What if we offer two different host programs
> 
> 1) The current share risk and rewards program
> 
> 2) The "remedial" AGA program or ICC AGA where we do
> most 
> except for staffing and the groundwork. This would be
> something like you guys discusssed earlier with a
> prorated risk/reward ratio. We will spell out very
> specifically what they and we are accountable for
> doing.
> 
> Do you think this will just over complicate what is
> already apparently an overly complex process?
> 
> Larry
> 
> 
> --- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > I don't know who first thought of it but I was
> > thinking of
> > it as a change in how we do business for future
> > conventions
> > -- a revamp of the whole document. Of course, the
> > nature of
> > the document changes if we change what we want a
> > local club
> > to do. If we're taking controlk, the document will
> > read
> > very diff in places ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Yeah no doubt about it. We need to give them all
> > the
> > > info but in little bittee bite size chunks with a
> > very
> > > specific due date. 
> > > Accountability as you said is the key here. I like
> > the
> > > idea that you or EO brought up about
> > > fill-in-the-blanks with some essays. That way they
> > > can't claim ignorance...well they can but it won't
> > > work.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Oh, whther it's in there or not, let's list
> > whatever
> > > > we
> > > > want them to provide, soit's clear what wwe
> > aasked
> > > > for and
> > > > by when. Firts rule of accountability, what's to
> > be
> > > > done
> > > > and by when, right?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > . . .
> > > > > Although these are all in the formal proposal
> > doc
> > > > I
> > > > > believe.
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > AGA-sc mailing list
> > > > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AGA-sc mailing list
> > > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-sc mailing list
> > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc