Re: [AGA-sc] [AGA-conheads] Staffing

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

>> Would you like me to reprogram the system and reprint all the tags?


This is what I was "thinkin' not" to.<g>  I think we should have them pay at 
the end.  Pay-as-you-go is way to hard to track accurately, particularly 
with untrained runners... which all of these are likely to be.

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathy Olson" <kathy@thekrib.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [AGA-conheads] Staffing


> wait does that mean, NOT A TAB, or NOT as you go?
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Karen Randall wrote:
>
>> I'm thinkin' not.<g>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com>
>> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 3:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [AGA-conheads] Staffing
>>
>>
>>> I think we should do TAB ONLY.  No pay-as-go.  That's going to mess up 
>>> the
>>> system.  Unless you want me to reprogram the system to include whether
>>> they paid or not on the item, and reprint all the tags to include a 
>>> "paid"
>>> field.
>>>
>>> Would you like me to reprogram the system and reprint all the tags?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, S. Hieber wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay. But I will need someone to explain to me exactly how this is 
>>>> going
>>>> to work. Not right now, but before we start -- maybe before we get to 
>>>> SF.
>>>>
>>>> Otoh you have lots of cash transactions throughout the day; otoh you 
>>>> have
>>>> a long line at the end, no?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't expect runners to collect cash although I've heard it being 
>>>> done
>>>> that way.
>>>>
>>>> In 2003 and 2004, folks could pay on win or run a tab. So it was a mix 
>>>> of
>>>> both.
>>>>
>>>> sh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>
>>>> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 2:56:58 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [AGA-conheads] Staffing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think having them pay as they go would get MIGHTY confusing.  If they
>>>> are
>>>> only buying a couple of things, they can always check out as soon as 
>>>> they
>>>> have purchased those items.  They don't have to wait until the end. 
>>>> Pay
>>>> as
>>>> you go also means having to deal with large amounts of cash... and
>>>> everyone
>>>> needs to be forewarned that they need to bring cash.
>>>>
>>>> I saw one big auction handled this way, and it was a nightmare. 
>>>> Runners
>>>> didn't know how much cash they needed to collect from bidders, so just
>>>> took
>>>> whatever was handed to them.  Heaven help the person if they needed
>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> Karen
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
>>>> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 2:28 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [AGA-conheads] Staffing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nope, by tab I meant drink now while you're sitting at the bar, pay 
>>>>> one
>>>>> time before you're ready to leave the bar. If we do all the cashiering
>>>>> at
>>>>> the end -- everyone on tabs -- that's going to be a rush hour backlog,
>>>>> isn't it? I'm thinking back to 2002 when everyone picked up their 
>>>>> stuff
>>>>> and paid at the end. If folks want to pay as they go, should we do 
>>>>> that?
>>>>> I
>>>>> was excpecting that was how we were going to do it -- take your stuff
>>>>> and
>>>>> pay as you go -- and maybe allow tabs too, at least for the
>>>>> many-purchase
>>>>> buyers. But you have much more experience with diff auction processes
>>>>> than
>>>>> I.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the list -- the thought was that diff members of the group 
>>>>> might
>>>>> think up some specific "and don't forget . . ." tasks the other hadn't
>>>>> thought of.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sh
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>> From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>
>>>>> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 2:17:06 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [AGA-conheads] Staffing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure what you mean by "tabs"?  Each bidder will be in the system.
>>>>> They pay when they check out.  Do you mean letting them check out
>>>>> without
>>>>> paying and then pay later?
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought I had all the tasks you listed in the spreadsheet.  Oh yeah, 
>>>>> I
>>>>> did update it from the form you sent it in.  Let me see if I can post 
>>>>> it
>>>>> (even if I can't read it from here)...this might be the original; it
>>>>> might
>>>>> be the modified version.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> AGA-sc mailing list
>>>>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>>>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AGA-sc mailing list
>>>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AGA-sc mailing list
>>>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Erik Olson
>>> erik at thekrib dot com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AGA-sc mailing list
>>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AGA-sc mailing list
>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 


_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc