[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate
- From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
I'm a little confused by your reply, please clarify.
You're saying you think we should drop the late fee entirely -- but do you
mean online reg late fee after October 12, or walk-in fee?
What about the idea of charging an extra $20 for walk-ins but dropping the
membership requirement on the walk-ins? i.e., it's basically the same
deal, but it doesn't look like it from the walk-in's perspective.
- Erik
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, S. Hieber wrote:
> Got it; we don't want to disuade or surprise the locals from these other
> clubs.
>
> I don't have a problem not charging extra and I don't even have a problem, in
> general, not requiring membership. Both will tend to reduce attendance some
> marginal amount and there isn't any clear boost in membership when we have
> the requirement -- membership hangs in there around 700-800, convention or no.
>
> As we've previously discussed, since we have been requiring membership for
> this convention, we can stop now. And since all regs have to be members, I
> don't see how treating some of them diff is fair. Imo, either everyone that
> is late (past the yet to be established cutoff date) is charged a late fee or
> no one is.
>
>
> We haven't had a late charge posted - we could just skip it this year -- or
> we could post it now and hope two or three weeks was enough for folks not to
> be unreasonably surprised.
>
>
> I say forget the late charge -- it's too late, too complicated and we're
> hoping everyone avoids it anyhow.
>
> sh
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2006 10:22:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate
>
>
> My concern is that this convention will have a higher ratio of walk-ins
> from neighboring clubs than previous years. I don't have THAT good a
> connection with these clubs. So far, they're all probably thinking they
> can just walk in based on the info that has been relayed.
>
> This is different from the SFBAAPS guys who have been TOLD about (and
> groused about) the requirements since day 1.
>
> What about if we raise it by $20 for walk-ins off the street and $10 for
> walk-in AGA members?
>
> This is different from the auction and other stuff, because we have not
> published ANYTHING about walk-in rates. I'm also a little queasy about
> raising the rates spontaneously on the site on the 12th, because again, no
> warning.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>
--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc