Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>]

S. Hieber wrote:

  My concern about discounts is that
> they are vague in dollar amount and who actually ends up obtaining the 
> benefits.

Okay, THIS logic I get. :-)

I don't mind the work. Heck, I'll get Mom to do it! :-)

If we do it this way ...

-- 22 registrants are not AGA members. Mom would have to enter them into 
the database as "temporary members." I don't object to this because if 
they get 2 - 3 TAGs for free, they might decide to join officially in 
order to keep receiving it, or there might be a greater grass-roots push 
for Premium Club Membership.

-- 7 registrants are on the AGA Household membership. Do we give them 
more issues? I'll assume yes.

-- Board members don't need more "free" issues.

-- Troels Andersen does not have an individual membership; he gets his 
from Tropica. George Batten probably doesn't care, and if he does he'll 
get an issue from Seachem. Ole Pedersen does have his own personal 
membership.

So I've whittled the list down to 92 people who need compensation.

If we give each of the 92 a year's free TAG, that's really close -- 
$1840 lost revenue for AGA. But a year sounds like lot to me; almost 
undervalues TAG. I think 2 issues -- 6 months -- is better. That would 
be $920 in lost revenue, with $880 left to split between the clubs?

Am I right here?

Cheryl
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc