S. Hieber wrote:
My concern about discounts is that
> they are vague in dollar amount and who actually ends up obtaining the
> benefits.
Okay, THIS logic I get. :-)
I don't mind the work. Heck, I'll get Mom to do it! :-)
If we do it this way ...
-- 22 registrants are not AGA members. Mom would have to enter them into
the database as "temporary members." I don't object to this because if
they get 2 - 3 TAGs for free, they might decide to join officially in
order to keep receiving it, or there might be a greater grass-roots push
for Premium Club Membership.
-- 7 registrants are on the AGA Household membership. Do we give them
more issues? I'll assume yes.
-- Board members don't need more "free" issues.
-- Troels Andersen does not have an individual membership; he gets his
from Tropica. George Batten probably doesn't care, and if he does he'll
get an issue from
Seachem. Ole Pedersen does have his own personal
membership.
So I've whittled the list down to 92 people who need compensation.
If we give each of the 92 a year's free TAG, that's really close --
$1840 lost revenue for AGA. But a year sounds like lot to me; almost
undervalues TAG. I think 2 issues -- 6 months -- is better. That would
be $920 in lost revenue, with $880 left to split between the clubs?
Am I right here?
Cheryl
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc