Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

Sounds reasonable to me!

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question


> S. Hieber wrote:
> 
>  My concern about discounts is that
>> they are vague in dollar amount and who actually ends up obtaining the 
>> benefits.
> 
> Okay, THIS logic I get. :-)
> 
> I don't mind the work. Heck, I'll get Mom to do it! :-)
> 
> If we do it this way ...
> 
> -- 22 registrants are not AGA members. Mom would have to enter them into 
> the database as "temporary members." I don't object to this because if 
> they get 2 - 3 TAGs for free, they might decide to join officially in 
> order to keep receiving it, or there might be a greater grass-roots push 
> for Premium Club Membership.
> 
> -- 7 registrants are on the AGA Household membership. Do we give them 
> more issues? I'll assume yes.
> 
> -- Board members don't need more "free" issues.
> 
> -- Troels Andersen does not have an individual membership; he gets his 
> from Tropica. George Batten probably doesn't care, and if he does he'll 
> get an issue from Seachem. Ole Pedersen does have his own personal 
> membership.
> 
> So I've whittled the list down to 92 people who need compensation.
> 
> If we give each of the 92 a year's free TAG, that's really close -- 
> $1840 lost revenue for AGA. But a year sounds like lot to me; almost 
> undervalues TAG. I think 2 issues -- 6 months -- is better. That would 
> be $920 in lost revenue, with $880 left to split between the clubs?
> 
> Am I right here?
> 
> Cheryl
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc