Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

How about everybody votes for 6, 9, or 12 months. We take the one with the most votes and go that way. If that's less than 12 months then the remainder of the $1800 stays in AGA2K6 and is disbursed between the AGA and SFBAAPS according?

I move we distribute the liquidated damages from the hotel to the 92 relevent convention-attendees per Cheryl's list as a 6, 9, or 12 month extension of their membership, whichever number of months recieves the most aye votes.

----- Original Message ----
From: Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 3:12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

I think one could reasonably say that anything we did for AGA as a whole should essentially be a benefit to the members. We could even hold the whole $1,800 toward bring in an extra, spiffy speaker for the next convention. I don't really care that much, so I'll let those who do decide.<g>

Karen

----- Original Message -----

From: S. Hieber

To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board

Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 11:51 AM

Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

Here we have a very distinct amount, a precise value because Larry negotiated with the hotel to arrive at a distinct figure -- that's the essence liquidated damages, a specific amount of money (the liquidity) agreed to as full rememdy for damage that cannot be easily valuated or remedied by specific performance.

It's reasonably clear who was harmed. So, it's a matter of moving the value of the remedy to those harmed, which I guess is where we're at.

sh

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc