Gee, I don't know how I missed the extra $50... don't know where it EVER went!<g> That said, I definitely agree that a pay raise is in order and vote "yes". Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@dustyuniverse.com> To: "AGA Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:51 PM Subject: [AGA-sc] Humble request for TAG pay raise > Hey Y'all, > > Now that I have been mostly responsible for TAG for over a year, I hope > that the AGA BOD thinks I have been doing a good job. I couldn't have > done it without Karen's help, but gradually I am finding my own way. TAG > 21-1 will be GREAT! However, I am more aware than ever of how much of my > time is spent on the Journal. I spend on average 80 hours on TAG each > issue, not counting membership, other publications, and convention stuff. > > I receive $600 per issue for editing and laying out TAG. This rate was > established in 2001. I was not on the BOD then, so I'm not entirely sure > of the history here. The archives contain a motion to pay the Editor > $650 per issue, which passed, but I have only been invoicing the AGA for > $600 because that is the number I got from Karen. Whatever -- I'm NOT > requesting back pay. Just noting the history. > > I am requesting a pay raise from the Board effective TAG 21-1. I will be > so bold as to suggest $720 per issue based on cost of living increases. > I remain dedicated to making TAG better and better with each issue. I am > ALWAYS eager to hear suggestions and criticism to this end. > > Naturally I will abstain from voting on this issue. > > Cheryl > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc