We really need to make a decision and move discussions back to the conheads list. Other volunteers are probably asking themselves why they were invited to a discussion in which they are not being allowed to participate. I think we should go ahead with the Iwagumi challenge. Cheryl Karen Randall wrote: > Well, the _timed_ part of the IA challenge was 1 hour. It was probably 3 > hours if you include the time needed to set everything up and move it all > out of the room again. It would be less for a dry aquascape competition, > but certainly not insignificant. So that's another point to consider. If > we only get a half hour of "entertainment time" out of it, is it worth the > work involved? > > I'm not saying yes or no; I have less objection to a dry scape than anything > that includes plants and water. But we do need to think this through. (and > I agree, the same materials could then be used for the "sandbox" idea) > > Karen > > -----Original Message----- > From: aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com [mailto:aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com] On > Behalf Of Cheryl Rogers > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:34 PM > To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board > Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos > > The concensus here seems to be that we are negative-to-ambivalent about > a full Iron Aquascaper contest with water and plants, and > positive-to-ambivalent to an Iwagumi challenge with hardscape and > substrate only. > > So unless Amano says something really startling about his demo, I think > we should go ahead and do the Iwagumi challenge. I don't really see my > sandbox idea as being mutually exclusive. We can let folks play with the > rocks and still use them for the challenge, whatever night we do that. > The wet Iron Aquascaper took 1 hour, right? Surely we could do a > hsrdscape competition in 30 minutes, and then Amano could help judge to > "honor" him for using his NA Party idea. > > Cheryl > > > > > Karen Randall wrote: >> Just to be clear, I don't have a bad opinion of the Senskes at all. I > like >> them both very much. But we haven't had ANY speaker (including Amano, >> Claus, Christel or Ole) with the (recent) frequency of the Senskes. It >> doesn't matter how good (or not good) they are, when you have the same >> speaker too often, it gets old. >> >> BTW, I'm only about 45 min from down town. So if you have a car and time >> for a visit, I'd love to invite you for dinner! >> >> Karen >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com [mailto:aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com] On >> Behalf Of Larry Lampert >> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 7:08 AM >> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board >> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos >> >> Hey Guys, >> >> Sorry I am late on this but I have just caught up on >> emails. I am in Boston at a trade show all week so it >> maybe difficult to get me by email. >> >> I have only a minute so I am going to be brief.... >> >> Jeff and/or Mike can talk we can decide who. >> Regardless of what our opinions are about them >> personally they are well known and folks enjoy hearing >> them. >> >> The Iron Aquascaper is an offer we can either, accept, >> turn it down, or propose a counteroffer. >> If we do it I would prefer to do the Iwagumi- I don't >> think it matters to much that it is a rip off of ADA's >> idea ;-) >> >> >> We have time to figure this out without everyone >> getting upset about things yet. Please save that for a >> week or two out when someone cancels on us and we have >> no time to backfill ;-). >> >> As far as scheduling Karen has already done what I >> suggested earlierwhich is to first ask Amano and then >> schedule aroundhis time preferences. >> >> I have a call with Seachem scheduled for this >> morning. I will give a report tonight. This may help >> answer some questions. I would like to table Karen's >> vote until then. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Larry >> >> >> --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote: >> >>> OK guys, we don't need people to start lurking. We >>> need to discuss this, >>> (and that means EVERYONE, particularly those who >>> have not yet expressed an >>> opinion) make a decision and then get back to work. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> So far, it looks like we've got Larry and Scott for >>> doing IA, and Karen and >>> Erik against. If it takes doing it by a vote, I >>> make the following motions: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. I move that we NOT hold the IA competition this >>> year, thank Jeff >>> very much for his offer of organizing it, and ask >>> for a rain check for the >>> next convention. (avoiding ruffled feathers by >>> pointing out that we don't >>> want to rain on Amano's parade) >>> 2. I move that we set up two or three (10 gallon?) >>> tanks with sand and >>> nice rocks in the vendor room for people to play >>> with during the convention. >>> >>> >>> >>> Karen >>> >>> >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> From: aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com >>> [mailto:aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com] On >>> Behalf Of S. Hieber >>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 8:06 PM >>> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board >>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos >>> >>> >>> >>> I did not think that holding diff points the view >>> and discussing them was >>> seen as insisting on something. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'll ratchet back. Althought, we might all end up >>> lurking. >>> >>> >>> >>> sh >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> >>> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board >>> <aga-sc@thekrib.com> >>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2008 7:17:24 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos >>> >>> Notwithstanding what Scott said off-list, I get a >>> "this is what we're >>> gonna do" vibe coming from him, and to a lesser >>> extent, Larry. It feels >>> like my input is being ignored, and it has certainly >>> made me reconsider >>> how much energy I wish to put into the planning of >>> the event. It's >>> especially maddening after the many many months of >>> being asked for input >>> on the hotel contract (areas which I feel massively >>> NOT qualified to help >>> out on)... then suddenly to be presented with >>> "here's who we're asking to >>> speak, and we're going to do Iron Aquascaper, and a >>> demo", etc, in the >>> areas which I *am* qualified to give opinions. >>> >>> I will rehash what I have mostly stated on conheads, >>> in a more concise >>> format. Then I will go back to lurking: >>> >>> 1. I agree with Karen 100% that Iron Aquascaper + >>> Amano Demo = Too Much. >>> We have to get double plants, more tanks, more wet, >>> more clean-up. >>> Remember also that these events take TWO HOURS EACH. >>> That's a lot of >>> sitting around waiting for things to happen. >>> >>> 2. Something easy to set up, on *Friday* night, such >>> as a hardscape-only >>> challenge or workshop, seems both doable and >>> exciting to me, especially if >>> it had a nice lead-in. >>> >>> 3. Mike spoke in 2004, Jeff spoke in 2006 >>> (photography) AND at NEC last >>> year. They're very good to the AGA, but we might be >>> in Senske overload. >>> I don't remember Jeff's talk in 2006, other than >>> half of it was in >>> Photoshop. I should go back and look at the DVD. >>> >>> 4. We need to have something good for the banquet, >>> 'cause aquascaping >>> contest awards alone won't cut it anymore. >>> >>> 5. Karen, you left out Dr. Tan, confirmed right? >>> >>> >>> >>> Now, maybe there is a possibility of killing two >>> birds with one stone >>> here. What is Jeff (or Mike's) topic? Maybe they >>> could be persuaded to >>> do a sort of "pro aquascaping with easy plants", as >>> that tends to be >>> something they excel at for some of their client >>> installations. Maybe >>> that would cover some of the 'basics' we are >>> currently missing. >>> >>> Back to lurk now. >>> >>> - Erik >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Karen Randall wrote: >>> >>>> If you get this twice, folks, I'm sorry. I've >>> been having a terrible time >>>> with my e-mail today. This looks like it was sent >>> on my end, but didn't >>>> come back to me (as it should) as part of the AGA >>> BOD list. Here's what I >>>> wrote earlier: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> OK, I've moved this to the BOD list, because I >>> really think we have to >>> hash >>>> out some decisions, and I think we want to present >>> a united front on the >>>> larger list. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here is what Larry sent to the list. It sounded >>> pretty confirmed to me: >>>> >>>>>> Yes, we have Speakers confirmed..... >>>> >>>> We have confirmed Karen Randall, and either or >>> both Jeff and Mike Senske. >>> We >>>> will also have a Seachem speaker but that may >>> happen if we do the tour of >>>> their facility. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I talked to Ricky yesterday (He and Doug are in >>> San Diego for a trade >>> show) >>>> and he is going to talk to Doug again. I will be >>> talking to Doug next >>> week >>>> to get all of the Seachem arrangements confirmed. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here is the prospective list with a C for those >>> who are confirmed and a T >>>> for Tentative: >>>> >>>> 1. Karen Randall - C >>>> >>>> 2. Jeff Senske - C >>>> >>>> 3. Mike Senske - T >>>> >>>> 4. Seachem Speaker TBA - T >>>> >>>> 5. Takashi Amano - T<< >>>> >>>> >> === message truncated ===> >> _______________________________________________ >>> AGA-sc mailing list >>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com >>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> AGA-sc mailing list >> AGA-sc@thekrib.com >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AGA-sc mailing list >> AGA-sc@thekrib.com >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc >> >> > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc