[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos
- From: Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:23:17 -0500
OK then it appears that we have decided to do the Iwagumi. Lets bring it back
to the con list and ask for a volunteer to run it.
I am on the floor at the boston conv center and fly home tonight so I may not
be available til tomorrow
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@dustyuniverse.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:49 PM
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos
We really need to make a decision and move discussions back to the
conheads list. Other volunteers are probably asking themselves why they
were invited to a discussion in which they are not being allowed to
participate.
I think we should go ahead with the Iwagumi challenge.
Cheryl
Karen Randall wrote:
> Well, the _timed_ part of the IA challenge was 1 hour. It was probably 3
> hours if you include the time needed to set everything up and move it all
> out of the room again. It would be less for a dry aquascape competition,
> but certainly not insignificant. So that's another point to consider. If
> we only get a half hour of "entertainment time" out of it, is it worth the
> work involved?
>
> I'm not saying yes or no; I have less objection to a dry scape than anything
> that includes plants and water. But we do need to think this through. (and
> I agree, the same materials could then be used for the "sandbox" idea)
>
> Karen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com [mailto:aga-sc-bounces@thekrib.com] On
> Behalf Of Cheryl Rogers
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:34 PM
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board
> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Speakers and Aquascaping Demos
>
> The concensus here seems to be that we are negative-to-ambivalent about
> a full Iron Aquascaper contest with water and plants, and
> positive-to-ambivalent to an Iwagumi challenge with hardscape and
> substrate only.
>
> So unless Amano says something really startling about his demo, I think
> we should go ahead and do the Iwagumi challenge. I don't really see my
> sandbox idea as being mutually exclusive. We can let folks play with the
> rocks and still use them for the challenge, whatever night we do that.
> The wet Iron Aquascaper took 1 hour, right? Surely we could do a
> hsrdscape competition in 30 minutes, and then Amano could help judge to
> "honor" him for using his NA Party idea.
>
> Cheryl
>
>
>
>
> Karen Randall wrote:
>> Just to b
[The entire original message is not included]
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc