Scot, I usually don't question Vinny's IDs - he is quite good at it (For all I know I might have IDd it for him!) - but I don't think this is A. sp. Wangenflecken. The caudal spot is too long and narrow for Wangenflecken. The bands in the tail are too prominent and I think I see a darker Bar 7 showing below the lateral band (typical of the caetei-complex). As Ken says it looks like the fish pictured on p. 54 as A. caetei Blaukopf/Blue-head in Mayland & Bork's book. In Römer's Atlas it is listed as A. sp. Steel Blue and in Matuzaka, et. al. as A. sp. New Blue. Matuzaka considers it a domestic cross between a resticulosa- & caetei-complex species. Römer states that Steel Blue was bred in Germany from Asian males and wild females. My question is where and how did the German breeder find wild females when the species is only known from domestic bred fish. I believe that they used whatever would work and didn't really care if it was a hybrid. Obviously it is fertile and doesn't show any hybrid deformities seen in some apisto crosses. This is OK if you realize that they are breeding a domestic hybrid to produce a colorful fish - like Red Swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri x X. maculatus x X. variatus x ???). It's not a fish I personally want to keep. There are just too many colorful true species out there to work with. By the way, the fish listed as Blue-head & pictured in the Aqualog Book (SAII) on p. 28 (bottom 2 photos) is not the same fish. They are a pair of cacatuoides-like A. luelingi. Now if you want some Wangenflecken (the species is shown as A. resticulosa on p. 116 & 117 in Linke & Staeck, 1994). Dominic Isla has a few that came in as contaminants. Check out the latest ApistoEmporium & ACA Trading Post. (I IDd them) To answer Stephs question, the real A. resticulosa has been exported by Trop Rio (Marco Lacerda) and is available in the hobby. I know Ade Lau has photos of them on his web page. Ade, if you see this send us your URL. Whether or not the fish Steph saw in Perth are the real resticulosa or not is difficult to say. Live A. resticulosa is not easy to recognize. There are several populations in the Rio Madeira/Purus drainage that may be separate species or just color forms. A. resticulosa is hard to separate from A. taeniata, too. There are probably a half dozen or more species?/color forms of this fish, too. For now I just try to keep the populations separate and call all the species above Manaus (and not from the type locality) "A. cf. resticulosa (location)". Those below Óbidos (and not from the type locality) I call "A. cf. taeniata (location)". Anything between Manaus and Óbidos I just hope doesn't exist (LOL). Confused? Welcome to the club!! Mike Wise Scott Olson wrote: > I need help finding some fish!! I recently picked up three males of the > fish pictured on Vinny Kutty's site > (http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/5491/resticulosa.html) that he > identifies as the 'wangenflecken apisto. Of all the regani-group fish that > I've seen, these are IMO the coolest. The extensive powder-blue markings on > the head are really amazing. But I can't find any females!! I'm desparate. > Does anyone know of a source for these fish? > > Thanks much, > > Scott > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@listbox.com. > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!