Since it is AGA organizing this thing, could it be that they put too much emphasis (sp?) on plants rather than the whole? If someone entered a serious biotope aquarium from Lake Malawi or Tanganyika no one would have a chance since these biotopes are well documented and relatively easy to reproduce. Comments! How much difficulty count for (as in difficulty of reproducing a certain biotope)? /Fredrik Erik Olson wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, David Sanchez wrote: > > > Nice tank Max. maybe I'm biased but I thought yours > > was the true Bitope tank and deserved 1st place. Nice > > job. > > Well, see, everyone4's got different ideas on that... the winner of the > 1st place actually went and collected all native fish and plants from the > Houston Texas area. I;'m not sure that tank necessarily looks the most > biotopically-correct, but has the right flora and fauna. Max's tank very > much looks the part, but none of the flora is really south american. I > think this is where the judges tend to ding the points. Some of the > people at the convention even thought it should have been disqualified > because of the Anubias! Gad Zukes, that's hardcore! If we did that, only > one tank would have even been still left standing in the category. > > - Erik > > (Apologies for the bad proofing on this post. Traffic is at a crawl to > the site because of the contest opening today!) > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@listbox.com. -- Fredrik.Ljungberg@saab.se Flutter and Loads Department, Saab Ab voice +46 13 18 54 60, fax +46 13 18 33 63 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com.