[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: A. pulchra cf wilmeri was: Apistogramma/Apistogrammoides



Hi Mike

You are quite right - I do need a copy. My 'wilmeri' probably are Wilhelmi - but
the spelling problem is mine. The person i got them from originally told me they
were pulchra, but they didn't match any pulchra images I found. This fish is an
agassizi type. To my mind, the stand-out feature is the purple lower mouth of the
males. My friend later muttered something about wilmeri, and that's what I've been
calling them. Unfortunately, I lost the parents, but I have about 40 sub adult fry
that I'm growing out.



Mike & Diane Wise wrote:

> Dominic,
>
> It seems that you need to pick up a copy of Römer's Cichlid Atlas. The T-bar is
> fairly adaptable to water conditions, not needing super soft water.
>
> My question is with your pulchra. There are many forms in the pulchra-complex.
> I've never heard of "cf. wilmeri". Could yours be the same as 'A. sp.
> Wilhelmi'? Too often, it seems, suppliers are poor spellers. This is a rather
> pretty fish with a very poor name. It's now being discussed as 'A. cf. pulchra
> (Abacaxis)' because it comes from the Rio Abacaxis.
>
> Mike Wise
>
> dominic wrote:
>
> > Actually, I just picked up a pair of pucallpaensis. Can anyone
> > tell me anything about them? (They are currently sharing a 40
> > gal with a large school of A. pulchra cf wilmeri and i'm wondering
> > if they need the water as soft as do the wilmeri).
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Dominic Stones
> > Richmond Hill Ontario
> > Canada
> >
> > >--- Original Message ---
> > >From: Mike & Diane Wise <apistowise@fgn.net>
> > >To: apisto@listbox.com
> > >Date: 4/3/02 12:22:10 PM
> > >
> >
> > >Matthew,
> > >
> > >For now agassizii, borellii, macmasteri & all
> > >other hobby apistos (except the T-bar Apisto,
> > >Apistogrammoides pucallpaensis) are considered
> > >members of the genus Apistogramma. This genus
> > >might be split into several (3-5) genera in the
> > >future, based on features no less significant than
> > >those that separate Apistogrammoides from
> > >Apistogramma. It all depends on how important
> > >South American cichlid taxonomists consider the
> > >need to do this.
> > >
> > >Apistogrammoides pucallpaensis is present in the
> > >hobby right now. It just takes a little hunting.
> > >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com.
> > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help,
> > email apisto-request@listbox.com. apisto-digest@listbox.com also available.
> > Web archives at http://lists.thekrib.com/apisto
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com.
> For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help,
> email apisto-request@listbox.com. apisto-digest@listbox.com also available.
> Web archives at http://lists.thekrib.com/apisto


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com.
For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help,
email apisto-request@listbox.com. apisto-digest@listbox.com also available.
Web archives at http://lists.thekrib.com/apisto