>I am looking forward to breeding apistos and continuing to breed kribs for >fun and education. I have no pretentions of "species preservation" and in >fact find the idea ridiculous. Maybe I should pick another word to avoid >offending people, but that's how I feel. What is the point of preserving >our little slice of time? Is it any better than a different little slice of >time? Millions of species have come and gone, probably somewhat less will >come and go. Man's expansion is inevitable. There will be less room for >animals and plants. I am all for captive breeding if the purpose is to >reestablish a wild population that has a chance for survival, but what do >you hope to achieve by preserving rare apisto species for example? As their >natural habitat gets wiped out they likely will only be able to exist in >aquarists' "zoos". To me this is like attempting to preserve American >Indian cultures with reservations. Pathetic and doomed to failure. > >Just one cynic's little opinion, > >-Doug Brown >debrown@kodak.com Doug, You make good points (what is a species without its habitat?) but I think you have missed the jist of the latest 'species preservation' thread. Not preservation for posterity's sake, I think we are too small a group to direct the course of evolution. However, we can "preserve" and ensure access to good strains of dwarf cichlids for our own lifetimes at least. - - Steve