[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
N.pnudiceps was Re: Sexing A. Nijsseni
- Subject: N.pnudiceps was Re: Sexing A. Nijsseni
- From: Ken Laidlaw <K.Laidlaw@roe.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 08:29:06 +0000 (GMT)
>From articles published in the UK the distinction between
the two named species is that parilus has a metallic like
marking along the dorsal fin and nudiceps does not. They
could still be colour varieties of the same fish though.
Ken.
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 07:48:21 -0800 (PST) "Darren J. Hanson"
<djhanson@calweb.com> wrote:
> >N. Nudiceps UK 4.00e (lg. fish bought a pair inclined to believe they are N.
> >parilus)
>
> Kaycy here, by my understanding while being the publisher of the
> Apistogramma Study Group newsletter, The Apisto-Gram, there was an article
> in issue #53 written by Tom Wojtech, that N. nudiceps and N. parilus, are
> the same fish. Here's a quote from his article:
>
> "A couple of years ago a bunch came to my local pet store; but by now
> everyone knew that the fish formally known as N. nudiceps was now N. parilus."
>
> I, myself, don't know if they are the same or not, but I scanned the photos
> into the article and their markings were basically identical.
>
> Just an observation on my part.
>
> Kaycy
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------