Jason, They do look similar, don't they? Both photos (SO3364-4 & SO3372-4) were taken by Hans Mayland. There is a good chance that it's the same fish in both photos. This is one of the problems with the Aqualog book, quick & dirty editing/proof reading. Further on in the book there even appears to be a photo of the same fish under two different names! Nevertheless, A. bitaeniata does have several different color forms. Most authors list yellow, red, & blue, but if you're in the business of selling fish it doesn't hurt to offer even more variety. Now let's start with a couple of other errors: Also on page 21 is a mis-identified fish. Which photo is it. What species is it? On page 28 is a nice picture (SO3432-3) of A. cf. caetei Rotwangen (Red-cheek), but there's another obvious (well, maybe not so obvious) mis-ID. Which one is it? What species is it? Mayalauren@aol.com wrote: > Okay let's get started everybody! > > Page 20 1st column 3rd down is the same fish (specimen) as page 21 2nd column > 2nd down. Two different colour morphs ...Hmmmm! > Jason > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!