If the colors and other physical characteristics of fish can be selected in just a few generations, why can't behavior as well be selected in a short span of time? Natural selection of a species of moth in England took less than 10 years. Mike Roberts =========================================== *DataWest Internet - Nationwide Access *Colorado Springs - http://www.datawest.net *(719) 635-9999 - (877) DATAWEST *Virtual Webhosting - FrontPage - Ecommerce -----Original Message----- From: owner-apisto@listbox.com [mailto:owner-apisto@listbox.com]On Behalf Of IDMiamiBob@aol.com Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 14:03 To: apisto@majordomo.pobox.com Subject: Re: raising cichlids without their parents [..] And yes, natural selection compelled these instinctive behaviors into the fish, but it took millenia, not three or four generations, to achieve. My contention is that it would take dozens, nay, hundreds, of generations for genetically poor parents to gain the upper hand over good parents in captive breeding. And some of us are still giving the good parents the advantage, and therefore the instinct will survive. [..] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!