Edison, This is speculation on my part (with a healthy bit of input from Ingo Koslowski - an infamous splitter). Both A. agassizii & the A. resticulosa => A. taeniata species-complex appear in many forms that may be only populations but, because of their wide distribution, may include many sibling species. He writes that he can recognize 6 different A. resticulosa forms, 8 A. taeniata forms & 9 A. agassizii forms. Most of us have problems separating A. taeniata from A. resticulosa, so think of the mess that would happen if they each had a scientific name! This is why I strongly recommend not breeding specimens from different locations together if at all possible. This is why I personally steer away from domestically bred fish with no known location. We just don't know if we are hybridizing closely related species or not. Mike Wise "Edison C. Yap" wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike & Diane Wise <apistowise@bewellnet.com> > To: <apisto@admin.listbox.com> > Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 11:42 PM > Subject: Re: A. sp. aff. juruensis > > Mike Wise Wrote: > > Why do you think that they are going broken up, could you explain your > opinion on this? > > Thanks, > > Edison Yap > > >Sounds reasonable to me. Species like A. resticulosa and A. agassizii > (sensu > >lato), on the other hand, will probably go the other way and be broken up > into > >several different species. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@listbox.com. > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!