>From: "Roger S. Miller" <rgrmill@rt66.com> >Subject: Re: Fees, etc. >Requiring internet access for participation is a small requirement. >People can get access even without personal accounts and even in remote >places. This was brought home to me last winter when I received email >from a friend who was passing through Bolivia. On foot. He found an >"internet cafe" and mailed from there. > >Regardless of any internet availability, some people (like my >mother-in-law) will simply never use it, even if it would serve their best >interests. Maybe it's harsh, but I think the cost of allowing those >people equal access to the contest will be prohibitive. I have to agree with you Roger, except I substitute "hassle" for "cost". If the consenses is that we must accept photos, ok I'll go along with it but I think that if people really want to enter (barring Roger's m-i-l) they will get their stuff scanned. Everything would be much easier, faster, more flexible ... the list goes on. >I think this winter is probably the best time to do it. How about >accepting entries from Dec. 1 through Dec. 31, and (after the >catastrophic Y2K crash, world depression and famine) have judging Jan >1 through Jan 31? Winter is good because more folks are at home... over Christmas?.. not so sure... very busy, stressful time of year... probably better to start in January. >Judging: We really need input I'll have to think about it. Olga in Vancouver