>Am I wrong in thinking this? Yes or no? If no, what _alternative_ vision do >_you_ have to offer / put forward for the group's consideration? You were wrong in thinking this. See previous e-mail. A lot of discussion has occured over >whether or not our use of the term "aquascape" is limited to "our" >definition, as "aquatic gardeners", of that word, or is this event to be >open to "other" definitions/visions as well. This is the kind of stuff that drives me crazy. Why worry about this so much? If we agonize over every definition of every term... <sigh> >Keeping in mind the focus of the AGA, but attempting to balance that against >the reality of both the English language and the practice of most aquarium >hobbyists, I suggested that perhaps we attempt to "include" everyone in this >event. This would mean, when carried to its logical conclusion (logical in >my mind anyway) that this event be open to "aquascapes" of all kinds. Fine ... for the next time. This time it's planted aquariums. Let's keep it straightforward and simple. >PLEASE help in deciding these two issues. I don't wish to hear snide remarks >or off topic points being discussed right now. I am taking this effort very >seriously and want this to be a success. Those are my views. Olga in Vancouver ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest