Re: PAM

[Dave Gomberg <gomberg@wcf.com>]

At 11:34 AM 9/16/1999 -0400, krandall@World.std.com wrote:
>I have not seen Ichthyologica, so I can't even begin to comment.  I'm also
>not sure who you'll get to write this sort of stuff, and write it in a way
>that it doesn't read like a peer-reviewed scientific journal, but something
>of use to aquatic gardeners as opposed to aquatic botanists.  But I
>certainly wouldn't reject the idea out of hand.

Good.  I tend to write stuff like that, as do most careful observers.
Consider the Sears/Conlin paper as a paper of this type (as best I
recollect it).

>Just be aware, that for a while, TAG was getting the reputation of being
>over the heads of the majority of our members.  We've tried hard to include
>more hobby-level stuff because of this.

I would rather publish a pub that is too content-full than one that is too
content-free.

I think both kinds of articles belong in a pub, in about equal measure.
Just because an article has lots of info in it doesn't mean it is hard to
read.   On the other hand, there are folks who complain everything is hard
to read.   Them I can't help.
--
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco            mailto:gomberg@wcf.com
For low cost CO2 systems that work:  http://www.wcf.com/co2iron 
Tropica MasterGrow in the USA:      http://www.wcf.com/tropica 
-----------------------------------------------------------------