Karen, any horseshow methods relevent? sh --- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote: > I am not disagreeing with your point but to continue > on w/ the Dog show analogy. In a dog shows smiliar > dogs are judged together in "Groups" ie, working , > Toy, Hounds. They way it is done on a judging level is > that the dogs are not "judged" against each other per > say but rather to the "Standard". > > The standard represents what the ideal breed of that > dog should look like. How that dog conforms to the > ideal standard is how well it will do in a show. That > is how during best-in-show you can have an Akita vs a > Shih Tzu vs a Jack Russel, etc. > > The responsibility for understanding the standards > lies with the judges. They are selected for their > assignments accordingly. Since there are so many > breeds of dogs and yet only three main styles of > aquascaping with many being derivatives of the three > it should not be to difficult for the judges to be > able to identify and score accordingly. > > That being said I thought the judges this year did a > great job at judging and a wonderful job also at > explaining their decision in front of a large > audience. This is taboo in the dog world. The judges > very rarely explain any of their decisions even in > private. > > Regards, > Larry _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm