Re: [AGA-mcm] AGA2K4 Feedback Summary

[Ghazanfar Ghori <ghorig@gmail.com>]

Lol!




On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:31:43 -0800 (PST), S. Hieber <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Karen, any horseshow methods relevent?
> sh
> 
> 
> --- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > I am not disagreeing with your point but to continue
> > on w/ the Dog show analogy. In a dog shows smiliar
> > dogs are judged together in "Groups" ie, working ,
> > Toy, Hounds. They way it is done on a judging level is
> > that the dogs are not "judged" against each other per
> > say but rather to the "Standard".
> >
> > The standard represents what the ideal breed of that
> > dog should look like. How that dog conforms to the
> > ideal standard is how well it will do in a show. That
> > is how during best-in-show you can have an Akita vs a
> > Shih Tzu vs a Jack Russel, etc.
> >
> > The responsibility for understanding the standards
> > lies with the judges. They are selected for their
> > assignments accordingly. Since there are so many
> > breeds of dogs and yet only three main styles of
> > aquascaping with many being derivatives of the three
> > it should not be to difficult for the judges to be
> > able to identify and score accordingly.
> >
> > That being said I thought the judges this year did a
> > great job at judging and a wonderful job also at
> > explaining their decision in front of a large
> > audience. This is taboo in the dog world. The judges
> > very rarely explain any of their decisions even in
> > private.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Larry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm