Re: Re: Which issue? (fwd)

["David VillaSunscape" <davidlass@villasunscape.com>]

I second Neil's motion that I hire a lawyer to incorporate us for NTE
$1,000.
I also think that we can, perhaps, go gently into the night of PAM/TAG etc..
We can position it that we are merging the two publications, and perhaps
keep the PAM name with the logo of "The official publication of the AGA" or
the like. Dave is going to have to work with someone from AGA who is
designated to pull our stuff together and protect our interests, and perhaps
we could offer that to Mary-- I know you will all say that she would never
accept the position, and you are probably correct. Whatever we do, we have
to make it a policy decision on the part of the SC, not a personal decision
to axe Mary. I think we can pull that off.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: <nfrank@mindspring.com>
To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Which issue? (fwd)


> It is a good idea to have a consensus on this issue. I was not suggesting
that I or any one else talk to Dave until the "SC" decides. What I hear us
saying is that it should be a SC decision (without asking for MC input).
Hopefully Dorothy is on-line and we will hear soon from her on this
important proposal to approach Dave Gomberg about using PAM as "THE"
publication for AGA news. If the SC decides, I will wait for further
instructions before I say anything to Dave.
>
> If we decide to make this change, I think Dorothy is the best person to
tell Mary. Last week I emailed  Dorothy that she is the only person that
could be a useful line of communication between AGA and Mary.
>
> I also hear lots of support for hiring a lawyer. I make a MOTION that
David ask his friend to get us incorporated and that we budget $1K for this
venture.
>
>
> Neil
> aga-sc@thekrib.com wrote:
> > I would certainly not be opposed to the idea of approaching Dave again
onthis issue.  Whether he'll still be interested is another story.  PAM is
> doing pretty well at this point, and looks to break even within the next
> year without us.
>
> I ***DEFINITELY AND WITHOUT QUESTION*** think this is something that needs
> to be decided at the SC level, NOT by the MC.  I also think everyone has
to
> think long and hard about who would tell Mary, and how she would be told.
I
> can tell you right now that it should _not_ be me or David... we're the
ones
> who need to live with her.
>
> As far as the attorney thing is concerned, I will say again what I've said
> before.  IMO, we should just plain hire someone, pay the money and get the
> job done right,  once and for all.
>
> Karen
>
>   ------------------
>   To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
>   with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
>   Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
>   When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".
>
>
>   ------------------
>   To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
>   with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
>   Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
>   When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".
>
>

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".