Well Ecosystems says they are going to pay but haven't. I think they are going to bail, seems weasly to me. I think Erik and I are going to be VERY BUSY around the end of DEC/ first of JAN (I assume you were joking). So anytime in the next two weeks is the best time to talk to me. I have two weeks until they let me get up, because at that point if i go into labor (again) they will let it go, so I may deliver anytime from that point on, or be late. That one is out of my hands. Take care, Kathy On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Lass wrote: > Thanks, Kathy. Is the Ecosystems a real receivable, i.e. are they going to > pay us? > We should touch bases the end of the year to finalize who owes AGA what -- > you're not doing anything much the end of December, beginning of January, > right? > Take care. > David > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kathy Olson" <kathy@thekrib.com> > To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:28 PM > Subject: Re: Summary of 2000 -- 2002 (fwd) > > > > David, > > > > Hi, > > You should know exactly what I have done, because I send all the checks to > > you. So you have all that info. The only company I have billed and not > > received is Ecosystems for $1200. Otherwise, you get all the checks baby! > > > > Kathy > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Lass wrote: > > > > > Now that I have my Quicken back up and running (when Gregory set up my > new > > > machine about 6 weeks ago he could not get Quicken to work) I can easily > > > prepare whatever reports we would like to see. For reporting to the > state > > > and the IRA I will have to prepare the reports Scott refers to, which > will > > > not be a problem. All I will need to know from Kathy or whoever takes > over > > > from her how much we have billed and receivable for TAG ads. > > > David > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> > > > To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> > > > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 11:26 AM > > > Subject: Re: Summary of 2000 -- 2002 (fwd) > > > > > > > > > > If the 2003 revs include money from 2002 ad billings > > > > c(collected in 2003), then 2003 might not be that good an > > > > indicator -- at least, not without adjusting out the "prior > > > > year's" revs. > > > > > > > > 2002 was not really $0, but 2003 was not really as high -- > > > > it's will be a tough call without knowing the split. I'd > > > > rather see the revenues noted as Receivables in the year > > > > they come up and the Receivables carried forward, if > > > > necessary and noted as such in the subsequent budget. Same > > > > with expenses incurred in one year but not paid until the > > > > following year. There are other ways to handle these things > > > > for budgets, but this would at least let keep track of what > > > > was earned/owed when. > > > > > > > > We don't take on long term debt, or have shareholders or > > > > any complex assets, so our financial statements can be > > > > relatively smple but I think we need to see Statements of > > > > Income and Cash Flows, as well as a Balance Sheet. In > > > > addition, some specialized reports might be helpful, such > > > > as, for examples, Erik has produced from time to time on > > > > rate of memberships, turnover, seasonality of revenues, and > > > > earnings analyses of items sold. We might be making a lot > > > > of money this year on a particular book, but we mgiht have > > > > spent more than we're getting given prior expenditures to > > > > purchase the item, shipping, whatever. > > > > > > > > Erik raised the basic issues at the meeting; it's not > > > > enough to know that we're bleeding less. > > > > > > > > my 2 cents and change due, > > > > sh > > > > --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote: > > > > > I would be curious to see a more complete breakdown of > > > > > the $25k in TAG > > > > > expenses. Does one already exist? > > > > > > > > > > In addition to having $25k of TAG expenses in 2002, is it > > > > > not also > > > > > true that we had virtually no ad income in 2002? Because > > > > > Kathy was not > > > > > on the job until 2003, right? And one of the first things > > > > > she did was > > > > > send out invoices! > > > > > > > > > > Given that, and David's comments, I think that 2003 might > > > > > be more > > > > > representative of what we can expect in 2004 than any > > > > > previous year. > > > > > > > > ===== > > > > S. Hieber > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > > > > http://companion.yahoo.com/ > > > > ------------------ > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > > > > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > > > > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > > > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > > > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > > > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > > > > > > ------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > > > > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".