Hey, sorry to offer to have Tomoko room with you, for some reason I thought she did in Tenn, now I remember it was Dorothy! I agree, she deserves her own room. K On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Karen Randall wrote: > I agree with much of what Kathy has said. Other thoughts: > > 1. I don't think that they would need to pay for both Tomoko AND Amano's > person, though. I suspect that Amano will be comfortable enough with Tomoko > after Tennessee and the fact that she translates ALL his articles for us > that he won't feel the need for someone else. He paid for Nozomi to come > the last time. I think if he wants him to come, he'd probably willing to > bring him on his own dime again. > > 2. As far as Tomoko rooming with me, that is dependent on whether Dorothy > is coming or not. Dorothy is my "regular roomie". I set up to share with > Christel this year first because at that point it didn't look like we had > talked Dorothy into coming, and second, I wanted to make sure that Christel > had a really good time, and the opportunity to get out collecting. I like > Tomoko a lot, and would have no problem sharing a room with her, but Dorothy > comes first!<g> Plus, for Amano to work, I think we are all in agreement > that Tomoko makes or breaks it. I think she deserves a room of her own for > that. > > I agree with Kathy that having Amano come and NOT having him set up a tank > would be a shame, and would probably be a disappointment to people who heard > the rave reviews about it from Chattanooga. > > The numbers look pretty good to me too, but I wasn't that involved with that > part in the past, so others will ahve to make the final call on that piece. > > Karen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kathy Olson" <kathy@thekrib.com> > To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> > Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 12:26 AM > Subject: Re: GWAPA Proposal rough draft2 (fwd) > > > > > > Hi, (Scott...Edit this email, if forwarded, I was pretty frank in places) > > > > I just did a quick look. Things that jump out at me...I like the speaker > > line-up. Not sure on the inner bay one though...pretty localized, and > > they have great workshop ideas...not sure they can fit them all in. In > > fact hate to say it but that sounds more like a local speaker topic to > > me...now I may be a party pooper, but how would I apply this to MY TANKS. > > I would much rather see some of the things below. Perhaps this is > > something that was discussed on the lists. Perhaps this could be a > > workshop vs a main talk. > > > > I would REALLY LOVE to see AMANO set up a TANK. DO A TANK AQUASCAPING AS > > he did in Tennessee....that was just awesome. Then I would like to see > > the tank he sets up AUCTIONED!!! Owning an amano tank would just be too > > cool. I think that would be a big thing. If Ganzafar hasn't seen the > > TENN workshop where Amano did this, it is well worth it. Watching him set > > up a tank, brought home those techniques much more than a talk would. > > PLEASE, PLEASE, ask them to do this if they get amano. > > > > If they do get AMANO, TOMOKO SCHUM is a MUST!!! She really does a better > > job interpreting, and carry's the humor as well. His translator still has > > to be there. It means paying for her room etc, and if necessary airfare > > it is WELL WORTH it. I can't remember if she shared a room with Karen or > > not, but if willing to do that, it can cut costs. > > > > Not sure on the cash bar, don't you have to guarantee so much in sales for > > that...seems like a way to loose money. > > > > Not sure you have to have a silent auction too....I would leave that to > > people that went this year, not sure how that worked. > > > > Hotel costs more, but I think it is a good price for Baltimore. I can't > > remember the ACA's cap, but I think it was 89 or so. That being said, I > > wouldn't hesitate to pay it to have a hotel with a shuttle! > > > > The banquet numbers look OPTIMISTIC, how many went to the banquet in TX, > > what fraction of the total. Amano would be a big banquet draw, but not > > sure he could do a main talk/workshop and banquet. So perhaps Jan, or > > perhaps Amano, who knows, more thoughts. But still, the numbers look high > > to me. > > > > Also need a budget for speaker gifts, I know Karen jumped in and helped a > > lot on this one. But something nice for Amano if here. > > > > Registration costs look REALLY good, I like those numbers. > > > > On the field trip at $20, I wouldn't expect a free lunch, so if they have > > to turn people loose for lunch that is okay, but if they get someone to > > cover it that is great. > > > > Make sure they know EVERY DONATION HAS TO GET A THANK YOU, or else of > > course the donor may not ever do it again! > > > > Perhaps is AMANO did a tank KIM BRYANT would donate lights, then we would > > need to give him program credit. He usually runs things pretty close and > > can't afford to advertise, but supports the AGA in lots of ways. I would > > like to see that rewarded. > > > > Otherwise, like the topics, like the workshop ideas (which maybe shifed > > around with speaker ideas). Looks aggressive, but I would like to see a > > conference within driving range for folks and thing this is a good bet. > > > > Really curious what Larry and Scott have to say. > > > > Kathy > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Erik Olson wrote: > > > > > OK, so my first impressions are that this is a good start. It sounds > > > doable. And if Larry's really on board to help with hotels (and you > Scott > > > with budget in general), there's a certain amount of checks and > balances. > > > > > > * I like that they have "themes" in mind already, as opposed to it > > > being "just a convention". > > > > > > * Interesting dual-pronged approach of "The Crypt" and > > > "Aquascaping". Not sure if that's good (choice) or bad (too much). > > > > > > * I guess I'd like to see some worse-case scenarios (notice I > > > didn't say "worst"... I just want to see something a little less > > > optimistic than this year's baseline!). > > > > > > * Guess we'll have to talk on the aquascaping contest stuff. I > > > like the idea of integrating it better with the convention -- follows > what > > > I've been gradually building on the last 3 years. And if there's > someone > > > in particular who's got the interest, then I should bring them in as we > > > start opening the contest for business next year. But if the entries > are > > > like previous years, most of the entries would positively SUCK if > enlarged > > > to 8x10. A few would look nice, but most probably wouldn't. Maybe > > > instead there could be some computer displays rotating or per-category? > > > Inkjet-printed prints? 5x7's? Foam-core mounted? > > > > > > * Didn't see anything on A/V expenses, but I suppose that would be > > > getting ahead of ourselves... (did I mention I bought a mixing console > for > > > Christmas? My last pre-dadhood stupid purchase.) > > > > > > Scott, do these numbers look good to you so far? > > > > > > - Erik > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Erik Olson wrote: > > > > > > > Find the attached draft Scott refers to, at > > > > > > > > http://test.thekrib.com/GWAPA-Proposal-rough-draft2.doc > > > > > > > > (it's too big to attach) > > > > > > > > - Erik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > > > > > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".