Hi Scott, TAG 17-3 should be in the mail by mid August at the latest. (as was TAG 16-3) We're actually trying to work the schedule back closer to the beginning of those months. The fliers for AGA2K3 went out in September as far as I remember. Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:24 PM Subject: Re: GWAPA Proposal -- AGA2K4 -- 1-4-2004 (fwd) > The mailer for 2003 went out in Sept. Didn't it. Won't > there be a TAG in or about Aug/Sept.? > > Like I tell folks were I work when they want to submit > budget material late,"You can't get on the train after it > leaves the station." Running a schedule and a budget are > two primary tools they plan to use for execution -- bad > choice of words -- for implementation. > > sh > --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote: > > Karen Randall wrote: > > > > > Someone will have to find out: > > > > > > 1. Whether this printer does that type of stuff and can > > do it cost > > > effectively > > > > I'm absolutely positive that Eagle Press could. However, > > I do not > > think it is necessary for the same printer to do both > > jobs. There > > could be a "flyer" inserted into every envelope that is > > not attached > > in any way to TAG. The convention folks could mail me a > > box of those, > > and I will make sure the mailer gets it. > > > > Karen makes a slaient point, however, that this is not > > ideal because > > of the *timing* of TAG, irrespective of expense/trouble. > > > > > > > > 2. Whether the mailing center (when identified) will > > insert fliers (I > > > suspect they will) > > > > The mailer in Lewisville with whom I have been > > corresponding tells me > > they are must hand-stuff the envelopes anyway. I am > > confident that > > they can do it. > > > > > > > > 3. How much it will cost to get them to do this > > > > I believe the extra charge would be minimal. > > > > > > > > 4. How much extra postage we need to pay > > > > I very much doubt there will be any extra postage. > > > > > > > > It seems to me, that AGA shouldn't carry the burden of > > these costs alone, > > > but that it should be part of the convention budget. > > (which, I think, was > > > Cheryl's point from the start) > > > > Yes, but not only the financial burden; also the > > responsibility of > > timely materials. > > > > -- > > Cheryl Rogers, Membership > > Aquatic Gardeners Association > > http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org > > > > ------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail > > majordomo@thekrib.com > > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > > Old messages are available at > > http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and > > password "incorp". > > > > > ===== > S. Hieber > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".