Re: [AGA-sc] TAG 2005

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

I wonder, how would the sizing affect space, page number
and cost?

Would we have fewer pages than now?

sh
--- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote:

> Hi Y'all:
> 
> As I mentioned more or less in passing at Ghazanfar's
> house, James Elliot 
> of Eagle Press warned me that the price of printing TAG
> was going to go up 
> in the coming year. It's not that bad, really; only about
> $200 more per issue.
> 
> Here's an official quote per 1000 copies:
> 
> $2500.00 insides
> $400.00 cover
> 
> He also suggested that we think about converting TAG to a
> "regular" 
> magazine size. He says we can sell more advertising space
> more efficiently, 
> add pages more conveniently, and that he doesn't think
> postage would be 
> that much more. I'm not sure about that last one, but I
> can look in to it 
> if we are truly interested.
> 
> I am interested in exploring the cost, unless someone
> comes up with a 
> downside. My reasons:
> 
> 1. I have lately felt constrained in layout. Many of
> these tank shots would 
> be better if hey could be bigger.
> 
> 2. Karen ALWAYS gives me too much stuff. :-) Gosh, I
> haven't devoted an 
> entire page to the AGA logo in just AGES!
> 
> 3. Tomoko says she MIGHT have a deal with Amano's
> Aquajournal to publish in 
> English. I think that we could lose a customer base if
> we're not careful.
> 
> Cheryl
> -- 
> Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> Aquatic Gardeners Association
> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc