Again, remember that we are "listening in" on a private conversation. No
one but Tom has talked to us officially yet. Dave has had a separate side
conversation with me, but THAT was kind of an "off the record" conversation
so far too. (not that he had a problem talking to the BOD about it)
Karen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] They sound serious!
S. Hieber wrote:
Serious counts. But I still don't see who is in charge --
who will actually keep things moving in the right
directions, prevent runaways, etc.
I think we should start as we mean to go on--be firm and direct. If e-mail
is too impersonal/gruff (my new favorite word, supplanting "wonky"),
somebody call them.
Hmmm-- a 2-hour drive/ride and 2-hours back? That's a long
day just to see a fish store.
I ain't going.
It almost sounds like they expect AGA to propose to them
that they do the convention.
Then let's do that. I ain't above begging. As soon as they tell me who is
in charge. :-)
Perhaps TB didn't understand
when I said I would send the proposal requiremetns and
guidelines doc after the BoD approved a revised version.
I've been messing with it. It's just ENDLESS and I keep getting bogged
down
in the Auction stuff. I don't know how anyone wrote all that in the first
place.
Cheryl
--
Cheryl Rogers, Membership
Aquatic Gardeners Association
http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc