Re: [AGA-sc] They sound serious!

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

Again, remember that we are "listening in" on a private conversation.  No
one but Tom has talked to us officially yet.  Dave has had a separate side
conversation with me, but THAT was kind of an "off the record" conversation
so far too. (not that he had a problem talking to the BOD about it)

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] They sound serious!


>
> S. Hieber wrote:
>
> > Serious counts. But I still don't see who is in charge --
> > who will actually keep things moving in the right
> > directions, prevent runaways, etc.
>
> I think we should start as we mean to go on--be firm and direct. If e-mail
> is too impersonal/gruff (my new favorite word, supplanting "wonky"),
> somebody call them.
>
> >
> > Hmmm-- a 2-hour drive/ride and 2-hours back? That's a long
> > day just to see a fish store.
>
> I ain't going.
>
> >
> > It almost sounds like they expect AGA to propose to them
> > that they do the convention.
>
> Then let's do that. I ain't above begging. As soon as they tell me who is
> in charge. :-)
>
> Perhaps TB didn't understand
> > when I said I would send the proposal requiremetns and
> > guidelines doc after the BoD approved a revised version.
>
> I've been messing with it. It's just ENDLESS and I keep getting bogged
down
> in the Auction stuff. I don't know how anyone wrote all that in the first
> place.
>
> Cheryl
>
>
> -- 
> Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> Aquatic Gardeners Association
> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>


_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc