Re: [AGA-sc] They sound serious!

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>]

S. Hieber wrote:

> Serious counts. But I still don't see who is in charge --
> who will actually keep things moving in the right
> directions, prevent runaways, etc.

I think we should start as we mean to go on--be firm and direct. If e-mail 
is too impersonal/gruff (my new favorite word, supplanting "wonky"), 
somebody call them.

> Hmmm-- a 2-hour drive/ride and 2-hours back? That's a long
> day just to see a fish store.

I ain't going.

> It almost sounds like they expect AGA to propose to them
> that they do the convention. 

Then let's do that. I ain't above begging. As soon as they tell me who is 
in charge. :-)

Perhaps TB didn't understand
> when I said I would send the proposal requiremetns and
> guidelines doc after the BoD approved a revised version.

I've been messing with it. It's just ENDLESS and I keep getting bogged down 
in the Auction stuff. I don't know how anyone wrote all that in the first 
place.

Cheryl


--
Cheryl Rogers, Membership
Aquatic Gardeners Association
http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc