[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Species Maintenance Program
- Subject: Re: Species Maintenance Program
- From: Jota Melgar <jsmelgar@compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 02:06:16 -0400
Randy wrote:
>With every publication, post each species maintenance registration.
I was thinking of doing that and also having a section of the ASG web sit=
e.
You make a good point in that a listing should only be made until the
species has been maintained for a set amount of time. Now, what would you=
consider a good amount of time? Personally, I was thinking 1 year. This
assures that the maintainer has had plenty of time to get the fish to
sexual maturity and has attempted to breed them. =
>I'd add a requirement to
>participation that the person cannot ask over a set dollar amount per
fish, the
>rate based on fry-juvenile-adult stages. Afterall, the intent is to kee=
p
them
>available to fellow hobyists. The maintainer should be able to make som=
e
money
>for his/her work, but the acquirers should be able to afford them.
Oh boy, you like making things difficult, don't you? Just kidding. First,=
what would you consider a fair price for fry-juvenile-adult stages? Shoul=
d
all species be given the same value? After all, it would be very difficul=
t
to prevent someone that has registered and bred, let say, A. diplotaenia
from looking for other buyers willing to pay a higher price. A way around=
this, and one that would reward participation, is to have set prices only=
for SMP participants that have achieved at least one listing (i.e. 1 year=
).
>Also, I would not include species which are considered commonly availabl=
e.
If
>someone is to register, they need to work with something that is not
commonly
>seen.
I don't think we can discriminate like that. What might be commonly
available in the East coast might not be so in the West coast or Midwest.=
For example, A. eunotus is a fairly common species. However, you rarely s=
ee
it listed or hear anyone keeping them. It also gets more complicated when=
you start thinking about morphs or aquarium strains, which many members
think are highly desirable. How about having a maximum number or
maintainers per species? Finally, which ones would you consider common?
Randy, thanks for all your comments.
Julio Melgar =