Mike Wise writes (as a reprint from an article): <snip>< Although > breeding the Tucuru=ED Apistogramma was consistently successful, and th= e fish=0Ahad > been distributed fairly widely among Apistogramma breeders, the species > apparently is again missing from the hobby. This is very unfortunate s= ince=0Atheir > natural habitat, presently known only from the area on the eastern side= of=0Athe > Tucuru=ED impoundment, has in all likelihood been greatly altered and t= he=0Aexistence > of these fish is possibly threatened by dam construction on the Rio=0AT= ucuru=ED.<snip>> Jan Busser wrote: > Hi, > > I've written to you all that I was building a nursery for mainly apist= o's > and guess what: It's operational!!! > So I bought some new species and found Apistogramma tucurui. The man I > bought them from only had 4 of them (2 males and two females) an I bou= ght > them all. >> Jan- Sounds like this is an exceptionally qualified species for our=0Afl= edgeling Species Maintenance Program. Although the dam that destroyed th= eir=0Ahabitat will in all likelyhood outlive us all, these fish should be= considered=0Aas significant to the hobby. They are very beautiful, and = reportedly easy to=0Aspawn. Please, PLEASE- as soon as you are getting s= uccessful spawns, let=0AJulio or myself know that you plan to keep them g= oing for a while. I would=0Aalso be willing to pay shipping plus a price= to get some from you when they=0Areach about 1/2 -3/4 inches (12-18 mm) = in length, so we can get some going=0Ahere in the States. Espcially so i= f your Government makes keeping them=0Aillegal. Getting them distributed= as widely as possible should be a priority. Anyone else out there fortunate enough to have some of these beauties in = their=0Atanks? Let me hear from you, please. I would like to track thes= e guys and=0Asee how they are doing. Bob Dixon idmiamibob@aol.com=0A