Re: charlene again, and next year's convention (fwd)

["Karen Randall" <krandall@world.std.com>]

Those are all excellent points, but who is going to do it?  Between TAG and
kids, I've got my hands full at the moment.

Karen

Neil wrote:

> 3,000 is no chump change. We need to know what the liabilities are as a
> function of number of attendess. Is 3,000 with current number paid? If you
> guys think there is ANY risk of not breaking even, then we need to see a
> table of liability vs number of attndees. If it seems that we are unlikely
> to attain the required number over the next several weeks, then it would
be
> worth (a) increasing our web advertising, and we should also consider (b)
> providing a discount or offering a special prize (what I dont know) to be
> give to or potentially won by an attendee. I must rather break even or
> loose a few hundred, then thousands. I dont like the idea of canceling an
> event, but I ALSO dont like idea of loosing bucks.


  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".