Reasonable. On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Karen Randall wrote: > What about charging them the $20 walk-in fee, but allowing them to put it > toward membership... either new or renewal? That only costs us the marginal > cost of shipping TAG to them for a year. (assuming that we are still at a > point that we are printing more mags than we actually use) > > It seems to me that it would avoid some disgruntlement if it appears that > theya re getting something for their money, and they MIGHT just remain > members once they've been to a convention AND received TAG for a year. > > Karen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com> > To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com> > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:37 AM > Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate > > >> I'm a little confused by your reply, please clarify. >> >> You're saying you think we should drop the late fee entirely -- but do you >> mean online reg late fee after October 12, or walk-in fee? >> >> What about the idea of charging an extra $20 for walk-ins but dropping the >> membership requirement on the walk-ins? i.e., it's basically the same >> deal, but it doesn't look like it from the walk-in's perspective. >> >> - Erik >> >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, S. Hieber wrote: >> >>> Got it; we don't want to disuade or surprise the locals from these other >>> clubs. >>> >>> I don't have a problem not charging extra and I don't even have a >>> problem, in general, not requiring membership. Both will tend to reduce >>> attendance some marginal amount and there isn't any clear boost in >>> membership when we have the requirement -- membership hangs in there >>> around 700-800, convention or no. >>> >>> As we've previously discussed, since we have been requiring membership >>> for this convention, we can stop now. And since all regs have to be >>> members, I don't see how treating some of them diff is fair. Imo, either >>> everyone that is late (past the yet to be established cutoff date) is >>> charged a late fee or no one is. >>> >>> >>> We haven't had a late charge posted - we could just skip it this year -- >>> or we could post it now and hope two or three weeks was enough for folks >>> not to be unreasonably surprised. >>> >>> >>> I say forget the late charge -- it's too late, too complicated and we're >>> hoping everyone avoids it anyhow. >>> >>> sh >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> >>> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com> >>> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2006 10:22:04 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate >>> >>> >>> My concern is that this convention will have a higher ratio of walk-ins >>> from neighboring clubs than previous years. I don't have THAT good a >>> connection with these clubs. So far, they're all probably thinking they >>> can just walk in based on the info that has been relayed. >>> >>> This is different from the SFBAAPS guys who have been TOLD about (and >>> groused about) the requirements since day 1. >>> >>> What about if we raise it by $20 for walk-ins off the street and $10 for >>> walk-in AGA members? >>> >>> This is different from the auction and other stuff, because we have not >>> published ANYTHING about walk-in rates. I'm also a little queasy about >>> raising the rates spontaneously on the site on the 12th, because again, >>> no >>> warning. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> AGA-sc mailing list >>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com >>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc >>> >> >> -- >> Erik Olson >> erik at thekrib dot com >> _______________________________________________ >> AGA-sc mailing list >> AGA-sc@thekrib.com >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc >> > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc