Zack, What I meant to says was that I am about 80% sure that the fish pictured are the true A. moae. I couldn't be any more certain because of the poor quality of the focus on the pictures & from what I could see there are several forms that it might be. Two photos can't make a positive ID on most eunotus-complex species. I'd really need to see the fish in fright pattern, dominance pattern, & female neutral & brood dress. Ideally preserved specimens are best, but who wants to destroy their fish just for an ID? Mike Wise Zack Wilson wrote: > on 5/22/02 1:13 PM, Mike & Diane Wise at apistowise@fgn.net wrote: > > > Your fish seems to have all the characteristics of A. moae. I'm on > > totally positive about this, but I'm about 80% sure that it is. > > Mike, do you mean the true moae, or the cf. eunotus moae, or some other > "moae"? Just curious since I'm already getting confused about what's what > since moae isn't necessarily moae and eunotus isn't eunotus, and help. > > As for the caudal, if I remember correctly, there weren't any stripes. It > yellowed towards the back, but that was pretty much the extent of > markings/color in the caudal fin. > > Zack > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@listbox.com. apisto-digest@listbox.com also available. > Web archives at http://lists.thekrib.com/apisto ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. apisto-digest@listbox.com also available. Web archives at http://lists.thekrib.com/apisto