[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Re: wild-caught fish -Reply -Reply
- Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: wild-caught fish -Reply -Reply
- From: "Kathryn Olson" <Kathryn.Olson@vmmc.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 09:25:40 -0800
>>> William Vannerson <William_Vannerson@ama-assn.org> 02/16/98=20
................... There
was a thread several weeks ago about incorporating location codes into
Apisto naming convention. Here's another reason to implement such a
standard. Known locations of a species may be genetically different
enough to warrant separation and to preserve the gene pool.
Sorry, Quite late on a lot of reply's here....schedule has been horrific =
and haven't gotten to check email, so I have resorted to lurking and =
just=20
reading the list replys. There were a few threads I thought I might=20
add...
...on the locale issue it may become more critical for breeding some of=20
the more difficult apistos. I believe it is mendezi that they now =
believe=20
there are subpopulations that won't interbreed based upon the river=20
system. With closer analysis I think this is based on the horizontal
and/or vertical stripe pattern on their tail....which varies based upon=20
collection locale (river system).
On other notes...there is a scientist (?Dr Chao) that has started a whole =
collecting and education system with the native people. The goal is=20
actually to help the natives make money utilizing their natural habitat...i=
e collecting fish rather than destroying it by logging or burning for=20
farmland. Also, one of the goals of the program was teaching proper fish =
collecting and storage techniques so less of the collected fish die. Some =
of the natives were also taught to record local collecting conditions. =
Quite impressive goals and from the latest news I heard it was working. =
The natives even had a holiday celebrating fish where the local kids even =
had a parade with fish costumes/posters/etc.
...on the sex ratio's. Uwe is quite good about quoting how many species =
and the total fish raised. From what I recall it was over 150,000 apisto
fry (I could easily be wrong though I am recalling this from an old=20
conversation). Now how many were from which species, I cannot recall. =
There were also a few that were reversed, in terms of the number of males =
and females. So don't assume that at low pH and you will always get ___ =
sex. It depends on the fish. I wish I had my copy of his article here =
with me, but afraid it is at home and I won't see that for another 48 =
hours. Hopefully somewhere in the article it will say how many of what =
species, if not I will ask Uwe next time I talk to him...but that may be =
awhile. Perhaps Julio will have some of that info.
Off for another sleepless night, but apisto dreams
Kathy